Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-21 Thread Nix
On 21 Oct 2007, Antoine Martin verbalised: > Nix wrote: >> It works with `noprocmm'; thus, a trivial forward-porting of the skas >> patch is broken in 2.6.23. >> >> SKAS0 is tolerable (and far better than tt mode!) but it spams my >> process accounting logs and is significantly slower than SKAS3

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-21 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Nix wrote: > On 20 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I'm afraid that on x86-32 I get an extremely efficient coredump from all >> UML guests with this patch installed :/ however, I haven't tried >> building a skasless 2.6.23 host kernel yet: maybe

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-21 Thread Nix
On 20 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I'm afraid that on x86-32 I get an extremely efficient coredump from all > UML guests with this patch installed :/ however, I haven't tried > building a skasless 2.6.23 host kernel yet: maybe I get an extremely > efficient coredump there, too. It works wit

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-20 Thread Nix
On 14 Oct 2007, Antoine Martin verbalised: > It's very rough around the edges but works for me(tm): > http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/skas-2.6.23.patch.bz2 > (can't enabled visible process cmdlines - some struct has changed) I'm afraid that on x86-32 I get an extremely efficient coredump from all UML gue

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-14 Thread Antoine Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Jay Shah wrote: > Hey, > >> Thanks for the reply. > No Problem. Please remember to reply to the list address, though. > >> Considering a few of my host kernels are 2.6.9, even going to 2.6.20 >> would be a big step up! >> Good to know that I wasn't

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-14 Thread Jay Shah
Hey, > Thanks for the reply. No Problem. Please remember to reply to the list address, though. > Considering a few of my host kernels are 2.6.9, even going to 2.6.20 > would be a big step up! > Good to know that I wasn't going mad about being unable to find a .23 > skas patch! You certainly weren

Re: [uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-14 Thread Jay Shah
Hi Gordon, While this answer may not be what you're looking for, here goes: I had that issue a few days ago, so I simply went for the 2.6.20 kernel anyway, and patched that with the latest one. For me, it was a safer bet. I did, however, use the 2.6.23 kernel for UML Guests. Jay ---

[uml-user] /proc/mm in 2.6.23

2007-10-14 Thread Gordon Russell
I was about to update my host kernels from the somewhat dated versions I am using. However, blaisorblade's host patches only seem to go to 2.6.20-v9-pre9. From what I can tell, the current stable kernel is 2.6.23. I did try to patch from the 2.6.20 version I found, but a few of the hunks failed.