On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> D: 21605
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Finally got around to trying this, and i'm having problems. i pulled
> > 2.6.11-rc3 and patched it to -mm3 w/o issue.
>
> -mm1?
doh!
>
> > Now the skas0 patch that
> > is supposedly for 2.6.11-rc3-mm3 has rejects:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Finally got around to trying this, and i'm having problems. i pulled
> 2.6.11-rc3 and patched it to -mm3 w/o issue.
-mm1?
> Now the skas0 patch that
> is supposedly for 2.6.11-rc3-mm3 has rejects:
Are you applying it just by itself? If so, that patchset is incrementa
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
> > impliment it?
>
> See my incremental patches page - http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
>
> In short, it's a BlaisorBlade brainstorm (idea by him, implementat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Interesting, thanks. Unless i'm missing someething, this looks like
> its for a 2.6.x guest kernel only?
What you're missing is that I'm in the process of porting the 2.6 patches
back to 2.4, so this will show up there at some point.
Je
On Friday 04 February 2005 01:40, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 02/03/2005 06:48 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >>pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
> >>impliment it?
> >
> > See my incremental patches page -
> > http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
>
On 02/03/2005 06:48 PM, Jeff Dike wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
impliment it?
See my incremental patches page - http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
In short, it's a BlaisorBlade brainstorm (idea by him, implementation by me
an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> pardon my ignorance, but what is skas0, and where or how can i
> impliment it?
See my incremental patches page - http://user-mode-linux.sf.net/patches.html
In short, it's a BlaisorBlade brainstorm (idea by him, implementation by me
and Bodo) which gives you some of the
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I honestly didn't know that I could use the FC3 kernels for the host.
> > I had built my own vanilla 2.6.10 with the assorted 'bb' patches. Do
> > i need to rebuild the FC3 kernel RPM with UML patches applied, or does
> > the stand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I honestly didn't know that I could use the FC3 kernels for the host.
> I had built my own vanilla 2.6.10 with the assorted 'bb' patches. Do
> i need to rebuild the FC3 kernel RPM with UML patches applied, or does
> the standard FC3 kernel already have full SKAS support?
On Thursday 03 February 2005 20:03, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it
> > > blows up almost immediately in the boot process with:
> >
> > I've had all sorts of problems with FC
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it
> > blows up almost immediately in the boot process with:
>
> I've had all sorts of problems with FC3 hosts (on x86_64, but it looks like
> i386 is just as broken).
On Thursday 03 February 2005 18:21, Net Llama! wrote:
> I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it blows up
> almost immediately in the boot process with:
>
> Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...<0>
> Kernel panic:
> check_ptrace : expected SIGTRAP, got stat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it
> blows up almost immediately in the boot process with:
I've had all sorts of problems with FC3 hosts (on x86_64, but it looks like
i386 is just as broken). There was a 2.6.9 kernel that worked OK, and I
I'm trying to run a 2.4.28 guest kernel (with SKAS) on FC3 and it blows up
almost immediately in the boot process with:
Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...<0>
Kernel panic:
check_ptrace : expected SIGTRAP, got status = 256
In idle task - not syncing
<6>SysRq : Show Regs
EIP: 0
14 matches
Mail list logo
