Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-19 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:09:00PM -0700, John Zavgren wrote: > If so, is there any kernel source code, from ftp.kernel.org, that works > correctly? Perhaps the most recent code? I don't really care if the > code is use is 2.6.16... any version that is relatively new and also > works with UML works

Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-19 Thread Paolo Giarrusso
John Zavgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Thanks. > I think you are telling me that 2.6.16 has a bug that prevents UML > from > working and I should avoid the kernel source code with this version > number on ftp.kernel.org... and instead I should use code that > hasn't > been checked in? Co

Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-18 Thread John Zavgren
. You have no recourse nor protection save to call for the impeachment of the current President. - > Original Message > Subject: Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set > up thread-local storage, attempt #2 > From: Jeff Dike <

Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-18 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 08:20:24PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > No, it's in 2.6.16-bs, non in vanilla. John, you can fetch that from my > homepage (see signature) and this problem will go away. > > I made this exact mistake time ago. Whoops, thanks for correcting this.

Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-18 Thread Blaisorblade
On Sunday 18 June 2006 01:04, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 03:23:41PM -0700, John Zavgren wrote: > > The root file system gets mounted, but I get an error about thread-local > > storage > > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. > > cannot set up thread-local storage: set_threa

Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 05:06:11PM -0700, John Zavgren wrote: > The host I've tried most recently is a "out of the box" Fedora Core 4 > host. I've also tried to build UML on two other platforms, without > success, one was Fedora core 5, the other Fedora core 4. Then, I guess they aren't 2.4 kernel

Re: [uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-17 Thread Jeff Dike
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 03:23:41PM -0700, John Zavgren wrote: > The root file system gets mounted, but I get an error about thread-local > storage > VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. > cannot set up thread-local storage: set_thread_area failed when setting > up thread-local storage H

[uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage, attempt #2

2006-06-17 Thread John Zavgren
Greetings: I'm trying to build UML from the stable release of the 2.6.16 kernel sources by doing the minimal number of steps... All I'm trying to do is prove that I can build a UML kernel from source code, that will mount a root file system. I'm taking my instructions directly from the new UML bo

[uml-user] Problems building UML from 2.6.16: cannot set up thread-local storage

2006-06-16 Thread John Zavgren
Greetings: I'm trying to build UML from the stable release of the 2.6.16 kernel sources by doing the minimal number of steps... All I'm trying to do is prove that I can build a UML kernel from source code, that will mount a root file system. I'm taking my instructions directly from the new UML book