On 15/08/11 04:04, Aniruddha Laud wrote:
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1002.2/01983.html
>
> I see this thread discussing a similar issue where the main question is
> unanswered. Is it just a case of the Kconfig option not being there?
No, minimal support for 32-bit on 64-bit ker
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1002.2/01983.html
I see this thread discussing a similar issue where the main question is
unanswered. Is it just a case of the Kconfig option not being there? Is
there any other way by which I can run 32-bit binaries on a 64 bit UML
kernel?
Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Aniruddha Laud
wrote:
> Is there any particular reason as to why UML doesn't have this while Linux
> on hardware does? Thanks.
Not really.
Nobody implemented it jet. :-)
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
Is there any particular reason as to why UML doesn't have this while Linux
on hardware does? Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:19 AM, richard -rw- weinberger <
richard.weinber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Aniruddha Laud
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The file system I have h
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Aniruddha Laud
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The file system I have has some files in 64-bit ELF format and some in
> 32-bit. Is it possible to run such a file system with a 64-bit Linux kernel
> compiled as UML with ARCH=um ? Normally, if I start up the UML, I get an
> error "
Hi,
The file system I have has some files in 64-bit ELF format and some in
32-bit. Is it possible to run such a file system with a 64-bit Linux kernel
compiled as UML with ARCH=um ? Normally, if I start up the UML, I get an
error "request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c". Is there any wa
