Re: [uml-user] SKAS/SYSEMU for 2.6.10

2004-12-28 Thread Frank Sorenson
attriel wrote: Amidst a large number of fuzz/offset notices, I get this when applying host-skas-2.6.9-v7 patch to my 2.6.10 kernel: The PTRACE_SYSCALL is now on line 410, and it looks like it should apply cleanly there (text all looks the same) -- Is there any issue with just making the change and

[uml-user] SKAS/SYSEMU for 2.6.10

2004-12-28 Thread attriel
Amidst a large number of fuzz/offset notices, I get this when applying host-skas-2.6.9-v7 patch to my 2.6.10 kernel: patching file arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c Hunk #2 FAILED at 359. Hunk #3 succeeded at 413 with fuzz 1 (offset 46 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 410 with fuzz 2 (offset -10 lines). Hunk