On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:05:18AM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
> I hadn't thought of putting the NFS server in a UML. Although
> the spoofing issue remains, that's better than what I had in
> mind.
On 2.6, you can now do authentication with GSSAPI for NFSv3 as well
as NFSv4.
> It's not clear to m
On 2005-02-02 19:22 -0800, Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:08:17PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
>
> > Would you rate hostfs as more or less secure than NFS ?
>
> Depends on your point of view, but I'd say hostfs is less secure. By
> definition, you're giving a UML process access
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 11:08:17PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
> Would you rate hostfs as more or less secure than NFS ?
Depends on your point of view, but I'd say hostfs is less secure. By
definition, you're giving a UML process access to the host in this
scenario, which seems less than airtight
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 02:40:52 +0100, Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-02-02 18:12 -0500, Edward Faulkner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:24:49 -0600, Christopher S. Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > "Sharing Filesystems between Virtual Machines"
> > > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforg
On 2005-02-02 18:12 -0500, Edward Faulkner wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:24:49 -0600, Christopher S. Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "Sharing Filesystems between Virtual Machines"
> > http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/shared_fs.html
>
> COW is great if you want each UML to have it's own indepe
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:24:49 -0600, Christopher S. Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Sharing Filesystems between Virtual Machines"
> http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/shared_fs.html
COW is great if you want each UML to have it's own independent
filesystem, based on the same image. But it sounds li
> If you had to share a filesystem between several UMLs running on
> the same host, what would you use ?
"Sharing Filesystems between Virtual Machines"
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/shared_fs.html
-Chris
---
This SF.Net email is spon
I do this with .COW files...
A single image file, and each uml instance has it's own .cow file.
Andre Majorel wrote:
If you had to share a filesystem between several UMLs running on
the same host, what would you use ?
I take it that making each UMLs ubd point to the same host file/
block device is
If you had to share a filesystem between several UMLs running on
the same host, what would you use ?
I take it that making each UMLs ubd point to the same host file/
block device is impossible.
Having all UMLs mount the same NFS export is the obvious answer,
but I'm concerned about the lack of se
