Re: [uml-user] UML support for Debian stable's 2.6.18 kernel

2007-04-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On venerdì 13 aprile 2007, Ryan Finnie wrote: > Blaisorblade, > > As you probably know, Debian released etch as stable last week, and > since the 2.6.18 kernel released with it will probably be around for > awhile (they're planning on a 2-year release cycle until lenny), would > you be interested i

Re: [uml-user] UML support for Debian stable's 2.6.18 kernel

2007-04-26 Thread Blaisorblade
On venerdì 13 aprile 2007, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:49:49AM -0700, Ryan Finnie wrote: > Here's the patches I've used on the latest > > > release (2.6.18.dfsg.1-12): > > Probably anything that we send to -stable should be backported if > necessary. Agreed - however, now, stable

Re: [uml-user] UML support for Debian stable's 2.6.18 kernel

2007-04-13 Thread Jeff Dike
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 09:49:49AM -0700, Ryan Finnie wrote: Here's the patches I've used on the latest > release (2.6.18.dfsg.1-12): Probably anything that we send to -stable should be backported if necessary. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot co

[uml-user] UML support for Debian stable's 2.6.18 kernel

2007-04-13 Thread Ryan Finnie
Blaisorblade, As you probably know, Debian released etch as stable last week, and since the 2.6.18 kernel released with it will probably be around for awhile (they're planning on a 2-year release cycle until lenny), would you be interested in maintaining a -bs patchset for it? I've been running i