Re: [uml-user] another gdb trace from a hanging UML process

2013-01-05 Thread Toralf Förster
On 01/02/2013 06:53 AM, Tully Gray wrote: > > I increased the stack size (CONFIG_KERNEL_STACK_ORDER) in the guest > kernel and the problem went away. I think I had a very similar problem > under 32 bit with Gentoo host/guest. with a value of 2 it seems now to work fine. Thanks again for the hin

Re: [uml-user] another gdb trace from a hanging UML process

2013-01-02 Thread Toralf Förster
On 01/02/2013 06:53 AM, Tully Gray wrote: > Toralf Förster wrote: >> This is still related to investigate an issue with a hanging UML/crashing >> UML (32 bit Gentoo Linux as host and guest). >> >> The following output was derived from the gdb - does it contain any helpful >> information ? >> The

Re: [uml-user] another gdb trace from a hanging UML process

2013-01-01 Thread Tully Gray
Toralf Förster wrote: > This is still related to investigate an issue with a hanging UML/crashing UML > (32 bit Gentoo Linux as host and guest). > > The following output was derived from the gdb - does it contain any helpful > information ? > The host kernel is 3.7.1, the guest ran a linux-v3.7-9

[uml-user] another gdb trace from a hanging UML process

2012-12-17 Thread Toralf Förster
This is still related to investigate an issue with a hanging UML/crashing UML (32 bit Gentoo Linux as host and guest). The following output was derived from the gdb - does it contain any helpful information ? The host kernel is 3.7.1, the guest ran a linux-v3.7-9431-gfa4c95b kernel 0x0805f27c