Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-02 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 01 February 2007 13:26, Antoine Martin wrote: > Pravin wrote: > > Thanx for reply. > So it looks like the versions that I have built don't work for you. I am > not sure why. Maybe the part that isn't statically linked fails to load > because of mismatch with your glibc version? > Jeff

Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Pravin
On 2/1/07, Antoine Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pravin wrote: > > Thanx Antoine, > > now SELinux is working in guest UML kernel 2.6.19.2 > > > > Problem is that in 2.6.19.2, the only options that are shown in > > SECURITY area in configuration are as follows, > > > > [*] Enable access key re

Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Antoine Martin
Pravin wrote: > Thanx Antoine, > now SELinux is working in guest UML kernel 2.6.19.2 > > Problem is that in 2.6.19.2, the only options that are shown in > SECURITY area in configuration are as follows, > > [*] Enable access key retention support > [*] Enable the /proc/keys file by which keys may

Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Antoine Martin
>> Please always CC the list, other UML people could answer your questions, >> and the answers could be useful to others in the future. > I'm sorry for that. > I just click the "answer" button and forget watch the content of the > "To" field. You've done it again! >> Note: there are issues with x

Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Antoine Martin
Please always CC the list, other UML people could answer your questions, and the answers could be useful to others in the future. > Because of the our last conversation i downloaded the sources of the > last kernel version, 2.6.19.2. > I am preparing myself with all pertinent information to make

Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Antoine Martin
Haywood Floyd wrote: > Hi Antoine. > > You said below "..Maybe the part that isn't statically linked fails to > load because of mismatch with your glibc version?". > I just readed int the linux documentation project about that matter. > Kernels configured using loadable modules need to find this m

Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Antoine Martin
Pravin wrote: > Thanx for reply. > > I changed my host kernel to 2.6.15 and tried to run those precompiled and > manually compiled 2.6.19.2 kernels. but I was facing same problem. > > {{{ > $ ./liunx ubd0=FedoraCore5-x86-root_fs > Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK > Checking for the skas3 patc

Re: [uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Antoine Martin
Hi, You are not doing anything wrong, if you check at the top of the page at http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ It does mention the fact that there are problems with recent host kernels (>=2.6.16). I can only suggest that you try an older host kernel until the x86 bug is fixed. Antoine (I'll top post,

[uml-user] selinux and UML integration

2007-02-01 Thread Pravin
Hi, I was trying to make SELinux work on UML with 32 bit kernel 2.6.19.2. I downloaded the latest kernel souce code from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ As, it is supposed to have both UML and SELinux within it. I got the ".config" file from http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/kernels/kernel