Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Fre, 2011-10-14 at 11:51 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 14.10.2011 07:29, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > > I have attached the trace below, if you are interested. It happened > > during/after /sbin/init was executed. Version is > > f2c0d0266cc5eb36a4aa44944b4096ec1214

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
Ooops, sorry, forget the full CC: On Fre, 2011-10-14 at 11:51 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 14.10.2011 07:29, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > > I have attached the trace below, if you are interested. It happened > > during/after /sbin/init was executed. Version is > > f

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 14.10.2011 12:08, schrieb Bernd Petrovitsch: > The question is IMHO more in the direction of: > Shouldn't `make mrproper` delete *all* generated files from all > architectures (and not only the current one) to get the tree in a (or > actually the) pristine state? To achieve this the Makefile ne

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-14 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 14.10.2011 07:29, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > I have attached the trace below, if you are interested. It happened > during/after /sbin/init was executed. Version is > f2c0d0266cc5eb36a4aa44944b4096ec121490aa of linus'es git tree. However, > everything is running now. It w

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-13 Thread michi1
Hi! On 20:47 Thu 13 Oct , Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 13.10.2011 20:10, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > > After migrating from i386 to x86_64, my uml started to segfault in weird > > ways. > > What exactly is the problem? > Without any details nobody can and will help you.

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-13 Thread michi1
Hi! After migrating from i386 to x86_64, my uml started to segfault in weird ways. In the end, I figured that "make clean/mrproper/distclean" does not really clean up properly. I had to use "ARCH=um make distclean". The command "make distclean" did not remove these files: arch/um/include/shared/k

Re: [uml-user] Questions about User Mode Linux

2011-10-13 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 13.10.2011 20:10, schrieb mic...@michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com: > After migrating from i386 to x86_64, my uml started to segfault in weird ways. What exactly is the problem? Without any details nobody can and will help you. > In the end, I figured that "make clean/mrproper/distclean" does

Re: [uml-user] Questions about user mode linux

2006-09-23 Thread Blaisorblade
On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:01, Lee Cartwright wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am looking into user mode linux to help with some testing, however I'm > not sure if it is capable of doing quite what I need. I have a couple of > questions that I was hoping you could answer. > 1) Is it possible for