Hi,
I've downloaded the new ActiveMQ-CPP and tried to compile it under linux
with 'make' and recieved then following error: "no rule to make target
`activemq/connector/openwire/marshal/ActiveMQTempDestinationMarshaller.cpp`..."
Did anyone tried and succeded ?
--
View this message in context:
ht
JDBC Master-Slave doesn' work with DB2
I have two brokers in a JDBC MASTER-SLAVE configuration.
When BrokerA starts it becomes the MASTER:
INFO BrokerService - Using Persistence Adapter:
JDBCPersistenceAdaptor(org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource
INFO BrokerService
I downloaded the latest activemq-4.2 binary
apache-activemq-4.2-20070209.025159-1.tar and got the followng error when I
tried to start the broker. I did not have this problem when I used
activemq-4.1.0. The tables ACTIVEMQ_ACKS, ACTIVEMQ_LOCKS, and ACTIVE_MSGS
were created so I know that my user x
I downloaded the latest activemq-4.2 binary
apache-activemq-4.2-20070209.025159-1.tar and got the followng error when I
tried to start the broker. I did not have this problem when I used
activemq-4.1.0. The tables ACTIVEMQ_ACKS, ACTIVEMQ_LOCKS, and ACTIVE_MSGS
were created so I know that my user x
See the example commented out configurations in activemq.xml
On 2/28/07, Suchitha Koneru (sukoneru) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion. Is there any documentation , which I can
refer to , in regard to configuring data base for active mq.
Sucgitha
-Original Message-
Fro
Actually ... after the connection is started one can get this info
using:
BrokerInfo info = ((ActiveMQConnection)
connection).getBrokerInfo();
System.out.println("BrokerURL : " + info.getBrokerURL());
naga007 wrote:
turn on jmx-connector and use jconsole to watch the queue statis
turn on jmx-connector and use jconsole to watch the queue statistics.
Gaurav Hariani wrote:
>
> Is there a way for a client to determine which broker it is connected to
> (when using a failover URI)?
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Failover-URI%3A-Connec
btw Albert - the test case attached to AMQ-1148 runs better if there
are separate connections for the publishers and consumers.
cheers,
Rob
On 28 Feb 2007, at 10:02, Albert Strasheim wrote:
Hello all/Rob
We're still having problems with Kaha persistence when running a fast
producer/slow co
Thanks for the suggestion. Is there any documentation , which I can
refer to , in regard to configuring data base for active mq.
Sucgitha
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:45 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re
Hi
I'm seeing a strange behavior, I have configured a threadpool of 100 threads
with
activationspec.maxSessions=50 and acknowledgeMode="Dups-ok-acknowledge"
I have 200 messages to consume, and each message actually never gets
committed
when processed (let's say the transaction is left running).
On 2/28/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did read the pages and configured the virtual destination. I tested and it
worked. My problem is that I am using activemq 4.1 and we can't configure
selector inside the activemq.xml.
So try using the 4.2-SNAPSHOT release which has the code to
I did read the pages and configured the virtual destination. I tested and it
worked. My problem is that I am using activemq 4.1 and we can't configure
selector inside the activemq.xml. You said that I need to start with
BrokerService for the filtering and I should not code in the producer of the
c
On 2/28/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I need to modify the code of broker and build my own version of activemq?
Use the XML configuration file from the page I mentioned and it will
configure virtual destinations to your requirements - no need to
modify broker code.
You might w
So I need to modify the code of broker and build my own version of activemq?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/28/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> James, could you give me a little more detail?
>
> Maybe try starting with the XML exampe on the wiki before worrying
> about what the Ja
On 2/28/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James, could you give me a little more detail?
Maybe try starting with the XML exampe on the wiki before worrying
about what the Java code looks like.
Do you mean that I need to use
BrokerService to get the broker info then add the filters.
James, could you give me a little more detail? Do you mean that I need to use
BrokerService to get the broker info then add the filters. If I do that, I
have to do it either in the producer of the composite queue or the consumer
of the physical queue, right?
Another question, when do you plan to
On 2/28/07, LiXiao2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am using the latest Activemq 4.1 and would like to use a composite queue
to forward the messages to several physical queues. From the activemq
documentation, we can set up filters on physical queues in the configuraion
file so only needed me
I am using the latest Activemq 4.1 and would like to use a composite queue
to forward the messages to several physical queues. From the activemq
documentation, we can set up filters on physical queues in the configuraion
file so only needed messages will be delivered to them. But that capabilit
Hi albert,
I'm just going to start using your test case and see if I can figure
out whats going on
cheers,
Rob
On 28 Feb 2007, at 10:02, Albert Strasheim wrote:
Hello all/Rob
We're still having problems with Kaha persistence when running a fast
producer/slow consumer.
The last time I ran
Having one pool or two shouldn't make much of a difference in the
grand scheme of things, assuming the pool has enough connections in
it.
On 2/28/07, drvillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I know this might be quite general but I'd like to know someone else's
opinion.
Given that I use commons
Hi
I know this might be quite general but I'd like to know someone else's
opinion.
Given that I use commons dbcp to pool connections, I face two setups:
-activemq uses its own datasource to store transient messages, so I end up
having two pools
-activemq shares a datasource with the applicati
Hello all/Rob
We're still having problems with Kaha persistence when running a fast
producer/slow consumer.
The last time I ran our test, we saw that messages would arrive out of
order, presumably when they were being retrieved from the Kaha store
and sent out (since they were definately being
22 matches
Mail list logo