I am sorry, I do not have any experience in integrating ActiveMQ into JBoss.
Karthik.Gopalakrishnan wrote:
I was not able to configure ActiveMQ4.2 to integrate it with JBoss . I
followed the same set of steps to integrate ActiveMQ with JBoss and i get
an exception IllegalStateException :
Hi,
While starting activemq i am getting this error. Any idea or
suggestion would be helpfull.
Thanks,
Prakash Sen.
E:\MQ\apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator\binactivemq
ACTIVEMQ_HOME: E:\MQ\apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator\bin\..
Loading message broker from: xbean:activemq.xml
ERROR:
Hi,
I am using incubator-activemq-4.0.2.jar and is configuring DB2 in
activemq.xml using
bean id=db2 class=org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource
property name=driverClassName value=com.ibm.db2.jcc.DB2Driver/
property name=url value=URL/
property name=username value=USER/
You simply need the JDBC Type 4 driver for connecting to DB2 databases.
This file is called db2jcc.jar. Get it and put it in ActiveMQ's lib-Dir.
garima015 wrote:
Hi,
I am using incubator-activemq-4.0.2.jar and is configuring DB2 in
activemq.xml using
bean id=db2
With jdbc and persistence as true it is giving really bad performance.
any idea how to improve this?
tabshift wrote:
You simply need the JDBC Type 4 driver for connecting to DB2 databases.
This file is called db2jcc.jar. Get it and put it in ActiveMQ's lib-Dir.
garima015 wrote:
Well I thought I was on to something. I created a threadgroup and put my
thread in it and sure enough the activemq created threads as part of my
spring context creation get created in my thread group, great. Then when
I close my spring context I get the threadgroup and call interrupt and
my
Environment:
JDK1.6
ActiveMQ 4.1
Linux Kernel 2.6.17-1.2630
Setup:
VM1 on local workstation configured with Peer transport
Topics: 2 published
Number of subscribers: 2
Queues: None
Broker configuration:
bean id=jmsFactory
For instance the run method in TcpTransport doesn't check for
isInterrupted on the thead. I tried added it myself but I think
readCommand is blocking and the threadgroup interrupt has no affect in
blocking I/O so it's not getting back to the while to check whether
the thread was interrupted. I
Well it does look like the tcp transport thread does get cleaned up
through inactivity. However there are other threads that don't and
I've included the log dump of the threadgroup:
(
DEBUG 23 Mar 2007 15:43:51,408
Channel
ChannelThread