Try turning on debug logging.
If you could provide a JUnit test case for what you're doing it always helps
On 4/20/07, Jim Alateras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't seem to be working. I am using persistent queues in a
non-transacted session. What log4j settings should i set to see what
James Strachan wrote:
Try turning on debug logging.
anything specific.
If you could provide a JUnit test case for what you're doing it always
helps
will do early next week
cheers
/jima
I try again...
Does someone have answers to:
- Is a release date of NMS (official release) is plan ?
- Is there an SVN trunk for NMS (VS 2003 solution) ?
-Original Message-
From: Cortembert, Rudy (MSCIBARRA)
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 09:54
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE:
I send message to topic when I monitor at Jconsole QueueSize=0 but
EnqueueCount=1. Message is returned from consumer.receive() is null
Please help me.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I-can%27t-send-receive-message-from-Topic-tf3611734s2354.html#a10093001
Sent from the
On 4/20/07, ttn_amn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I send message to topic when I monitor at Jconsole QueueSize=0 but
EnqueueCount=1. Message is returned from consumer.receive() is null
Please help me.
Could you show us your code?
--
James
---
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Hi James,
Thanks again for your help.
I've tried out message groups over queue. That's OK!
But I really need to get work on TOPIC.
I've tried VirtualTopic, but still can't get it wotk.
My broker config is as follow:
broker brokerName=localhost useJmx=true xmlns=
http://activemq.org/config/1.0;
James.Strachan wrote:
On 4/20/07, ttn_amn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I send message to topic when I monitor at Jconsole QueueSize=0 but
EnqueueCount=1. Message is returned from consumer.receive() is null
Please help me.
Could you show us your code?
--
James
---
Hi everyone,
The *ActiveMQ*-*CPP* 2.0 *release* is now official! You can download the
source
distribution here:
http://*activemq*.apache.org/*activemq*-*cpp*-20-*release*.html
http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-cpp-11-release.html.
There are several bug fixes and enhancements that you might want
I was attracted to Camel by the existance of the MINA component, but I now
see that it has some deficiencies.
Very generally there can be 4 kinds of MINA endpoints:
1) acceptors (server sockets, that accept connections) that initiatiate
request/responses,
2) acceptors that wait for requests (eg,
Great! Now I can really start doing work...
---
Kit Plummer
Raytheon Missile Systems
But can I synergize with my results-driven knowledge base while
partnering with self-managed teams, increasing single-source
responsibility while undergoing a complete paradigm shift to
On 4/20/07, dr.jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was attracted to Camel by the existance of the MINA component, but I now
see that it has some deficiencies.
I hope we can work on the camel-mina module to integrate with more of
the capabilities in MINA. Hopefully with some help from MINA experts
Interesting MINA hot spots are messageReceived() and session.write() (and
also exceptionCaught, but ignore it for now).
The Camel components can either do (1) acceptor.bind(address, handler,
endpoint.getConfig());,
or they can do (2) connector.connect(address, ioHandler,
endpoint.getConfig());
I'm testing a HA configuration, using activeMQ 4.1.1. I have two brokers and
a client sending messages with failover between the brokers. I tried using
the message groups feature to ensure that messages always went to the same
broker, unless that broker failed. This works well ... very cool
Hi, All
I am getting following message in log, can sombody help why?
2007-04-20 19:02:46,064 [eckpoint worker] WARN JournalMessageStore
- Message could not be added to long term store: Failed to broker message:
ID:rtbn-1289-1177098726692-1:0:110:1:1 in container:
14 matches
Mail list logo
