James.Strachan wrote:
>
> It is; in Java use stomp+ssl://hostname:port to configure it. You just
> need a Stomp client which also supports SSL
>
I am not sure that my Stomp client (PHP) supports SSL. BTW it is not very
clear for me where to find the "best" Stomp PHP library. I have found at
le
What you are doing is fairly unclear. It seems like you are trying to use
the StompConnect JMS to Stomp bridge as a JMS client. It is not a JMS client
though. StompConnect is messaging middle-ware. It presents a Stomp protocol
front-end, and translate to some other vendors JMS API. Its m
Hi all,
I also have the same problem as Pieter but using Active MQ 4.1.1.
My application requires messages to be sent from one site to another,
but he network connections may not be available.
Each site has its own instance of ActiveMQ running which is always
available. (ActiveMQ is required for
- "Jon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> I wonder what the status is on the following post:
> http://www.nabble.com/Firewall-tf2258067s2354.html#a6263450
>
> In a firewall situation only one connection initiated by the broker
> behind
> the firewall would work if messages would flow two-way
Hello active Mq users ,
I hope this mail reaches you all in good spirits. This
is in regard to the topic of starting active mq embedded broker
automatically by the Tomcat server. Our application has two web apps
which exchange messages through the embedded active mq broker.
The Goal
I need a Java subscriber client which runs locally. This client needs to
connect to an ActiveMQ message broker and read messages from
stomp://WKS-W0106843:61613 (this is the local machine also) the queue is
pvcrawlerXML.
The Situation
I have a perl script that parses files on the server
What are the release dates for version 5.0? Even having tentative dates (with
no obligations or strings attached) would be great.
Thanks,
Branko
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-are-version-5.0-release-dates--tf3984671s2354.html#a11313442
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
Hi James,
Thank you very much for a quick response. We are using ActiveMQ 4.1.1. I
think this is the latest build as of now. We are using Topics and fast
consumers.
In case i go for Journal option, Could you please let me know how much time
it takes to persist the message from Journal files
Thanks Chris.
I just tried this against the Active MQ running on my Windows box, and it
worked fine. Then tried it against Active MQ running on the Linux server,
and the connections leak appeared again.
So it either seems to be related to the OS it's running on, or the fact that
when running agai
Hi,
The heap size I configured was min - 512 MB and max 1024 MB in Jboss.
My Activemq memory limit was 512 MB.
The application as such does not use more that 250 - 300 MB.
I tried configuring GC interval to every 15 mins. The GC seems to work but
the activemq memory usage is not coming down.
On 6/26/07, AlexB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We found that activemq with postgresql persistance backend opens a
connection, starts a transaction and waits forever. Due to this reason
(extremely long lasting transaction ) all our 'vacuuming DB' fail.
Can't you exclude the ActiveMQ lock table?
What version of ActiveMQ are you using? Using topics/queues? Do you
have slow consumers?
When using the journal, it always writes messages to the journal then
checkpoints them later on to persistent store. If you want a high
throughput (say 3000 messages/second for persistent messages) then I'd
r
Hi James,
We are doing a stress test on ActiveMQ to see if it can be used for
production ready requirements. Our requirement is 3K mesages per second.
During the stess test we tried with small amount of messages. Hee is the
details. But after sending 130K messages it started giving outofmemory
OK, I compiled the following against a recent-ish version of NMS. I haven't
done a more recent compile because as I pointed out in the NMS issue tracker
there was a bug in the use of selectors which I had fixed in my source but
which hadn't been fixed in the SVN Repo (though it might have been ver
Hi!
I wonder what the status is on the following post:
http://www.nabble.com/Firewall-tf2258067s2354.html#a6263450
In a firewall situation only one connection initiated by the broker behind
the firewall would work if messages would flow two-ways.
-Jon
--
View this message in context:
http://ww
We found that activemq with postgresql persistance backend opens a
connection, starts a transaction and waits forever. Due to this reason
(extremely long lasting transaction ) all our 'vacuuming DB' fail. Therefore
all DB on that postgresql server became very slow.
Does anyone know how to force a
Hi everyone
We are performing some tests with different broker versions (4.1.1,
4.2-SNAPSHOT, 5.0-SNAPSHOT). In one particular test, we had 1 message
remaining on a queue, persisted over DB with JDBC. The broker was the
4.2. Later, we changed the broker to the 5.0, and started it. When
trying
FWIW I still don't follow how working with newly created objects like
ByteArrayOutputStream() on the stack can be a memory leak. Are you
sure its just that the GC kicks in shortly after you're running the
code?
On 6/26/07, comchyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 6/25/
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 6/25/07, comchyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I find an performance problem in ActiveMQ4.2-SNAPSHOT when
>> i subscribe an topic and consume 50 messages,the problem
>> is that the memory of CPU is consumed increasely all long until
>> the free heap of JVM'
Hi,
The aim of this mail is to know how to retreive a JMS message through a
method like doPost in a servlet (tomcat5.5 server).
In a tomcat’s servlet, we usually have to implement 4 methods :
- Init() used to initialize the servlet;
- doGet ( HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res) whe
Hi James, thanks for your reply.
I tried the option you mention, but it didn't seem to make a difference. I
will try the latest 5.0 snapshot as well to see if that's any better.
Regards,
Jan
On 25/06/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/25/07, Jan Stette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On 6/26/07, pascals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack Britton-4 wrote:
>
> Yes, see http://activemq.apache.org/ssl-transport-reference.html
>
Thanks for your answer. I forgot to mention that one of our clients is a PHP
program, which is thus forced to use the Stomp protocol instead of OpenWire
(
Jack Britton-4 wrote:
>
> Yes, see http://activemq.apache.org/ssl-transport-reference.html
>
Thanks for your answer. I forgot to mention that one of our clients is a PHP
program, which is thus forced to use the Stomp protocol instead of OpenWire
(if I am right). Is it possible to use Stomp ove
Sure, thanks for checking this out.
As per your last suggestion, here's a version which closes and disposes the
consumer and session, and only disposes the connection.
public void Disconnect()
{
try
{
if (consumer != null)
{
24 matches
Mail list logo