network of brokers: transports disposed every second

Hi, I'm using 4.1.1 and try to set up a network of 2 brokers: aqprimary.xml has and aqsecondary.xml has When starting the primary with the secondary already running, I see lots of the following with ever increasing vm://localhost#: 19:33:07,153 INFO [NetworkConn

Access Violation - activemq::io::SocketInputStream::read - The connection is broken

Hi there, I'm getting some sort of access violation/segmentation fault if I have a connection open and I shut the broker down. I think that the abend is the result of some problem when the session is closed. I'm using v.2.0.1. A note on convention for the following: I'm using boost's shared_ptr

Re: Threading model for activemq

? camper wrote: > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Threading-model-for-activemq-tf4001960s2354.html#a11368217 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Using XBeanBrokerService

Hello, We use ActiveMQ brokers embedded within our server applications that are deployed on multiple machines (under weblogic clustering). Each server application has multiple clients connected to it. Clients invoke server services using RMI calls, where as server dumps data asynchronously to cli

Using XBeanBrokerService

Hello, We use ActiveMQ brokers embedded within our server applications that are deployed on multiple machines (under weblogic clustering). Each server application has multiple clients connected to it. Clients invoke server services using RMI calls, where as server dumps data asynchronously to cli

Threading model for activemq

-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Threading-model-for-activemq-tf4001960s2354.html#a11367090 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ, Clustered JBoss and JDBC Master/Slave

Sambit, we gave up doing it this way. We have tried JBossMQ too, but we faced very similar persistence issues, so we arrived at the conclusion that JMS itself was not a very good choice to manage the nodes of a cluster. We've ended up using JGroups to implement an IP-multicast based cluster manage

Re: Memory usage always increasing

Try using the http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2SE/monitoring/ tools from jdk6 . Like James says use jconsole and then jmap to actually see which objects are the culprit in holding onto the memory. Gnanaprakash wrote: > > Can you pls suggest something in this regards? > > Tha

Re: About releases and bugs

James.Strachan wrote: > > On 6/28/07, Tom Samplonius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I have to agree with most of this. ActiveMQ is a buggy as hell. > > Thats a bit of an exaggeration & a comment thats hardly likely to get > the volunteers on the list to help you solve your particular issue

Re: About releases and bugs

James et. al. Here's my experience with activemq. I have a need to transfer large files over a WAN (involves multiple machines, and at times unreliable network hops). There files are generated at pretty much random intervals. I started around when 4.0 was being moved into the apache world. So,

Re: CPP client: high latency for large messages

Hi David, Thank you for the advice. I didn't think the tcpNoDelay would have an effect since I was looking at relatively large messages :) Simply changing the connection URL solved the immediate problem, send latency dropped right down into the microseconds as expected. So far I haven't ha

Re: Weird problem with network of brokers

rajdavies wrote: > > Can you add the configuration you are using when you file the jira > please? > thx! > This is the JIRA report: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1301 There seem to be some more problems with network of brokers and shutting down/restarting brokers, if I searc

Re: C++ client and failover transport

We are hoping to do something in the 2.2 release, but nobody is currently working on that task. azhang wrote: Hi, Is there an effort going on to implement the C++ transport layer fail over? Or is there any plan on it? Thanks, Anlin. tabish121 wrote: I am interested in sending messages f

Lock in ActiveMQ and Weblogic

Hi! We are probably facing a lock in the thread sending the messages to ActiveMQ. Here is a part of a thread dump : "ExecuteThread: '10' for queue: 'StrutsQueue'" id=21 idx=0x2c tid=3668 prio=5 alive, in native, waiting, daemon -- Waiting for notification on: edu/emory/mathcs/backport/java/ut

Re: Weird problem with network of brokers

Can you add the configuration you are using when you file the jira please? thx! Rob Davies 'Go further faster with Apache Camel!' http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ On Jun 29, 2007, at 9:30 AM, PieterN wrote: Hi, Steven Dalton-2 wrote: I also have the same problem as Pieter but using Active

RE: Weird problem with network of brokers

Hi, Steven Dalton-2 wrote: > > I also have the same problem as Pieter but using Active MQ 4.1.1. > [snip] > Is this a known problem? If not, I guess I should file a JIRA report (I've done a quick search, but couldn't find anything related). Regards, Pieter -- View this message in context: