Authentication and authorization using certificates

2008-01-29 Thread taavi
Hello, I'm looking for information on authentication with certificates in ActiveMQ. We are using ssl as the transport protocol. Several topics are used, one of them named secureTopic. What we would like to achieve is that only a certain client with a certain certificate can write to the

Re: Embedded broker, network of brokers and temporary queues

2008-01-29 Thread Eric-AWL
I'm french, so excuse me for my poor English. I have two servers - ytsvmx01s - ytsvmx02s Linux 2.6.21 i386 The two servers are connected to the same switch ActiveMQ 5.0.0 is installed on the two servers in /usr/local/activemq/release with root user On the two servers, I have a

Re: Single message from topiic to Multiple Consumers

2008-01-29 Thread Rob Davies
that's what topics are for - see http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Ecommerce/jms/ On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:08 PM, activemqnewbie wrote: Hi, How to configure multiple consumers to receive same message based on the selector. Thanks -- View this message in context:

5.0.0 WebConsole And temporary queues

2008-01-29 Thread Eric-AWL
Hi I try to resolve a problem with embedded brokers, network of brokers and temporary queues. And I upgrade my test server from 4.1.0 to 5.0.0. The new WebConsole doesn't show temporary queues, just fixed queues and topic, and doesn't show advisory topics associated to temporary queues. Is

Transport failed, attempting to automatically reconnect due to...

2008-01-29 Thread Ragnar Heil
Hi, This message occurs very often in the log: 2008-01-29 14:11:03,601 WARN [ActiveMQ Transport: tcp://myserver.de/86.109.253.43:61616] transport.failover.FailoverTransport (FailoverTransport.java:236) - Transport failed, attempting to automatically reconnect due to: java.io.EOFException

Re: Stomp protocol problems

2008-01-29 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi, can you file a Jira issue for this? Thanks -- Dejan Bosanac www.scriptinginjava.net On Jan 28, 2008 9:02 PM, Sebastjan Trepca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm using ActiveMQ(both versions are affected) with STOMP protocol and noticed a problem with it. At least I hope it's a problem.

Single message from topiic to Multiple Consumers

2008-01-29 Thread activemqnewbie
Hi, How to configure multiple consumers to receive same message based on the selector. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Single-message-from-topiic-to-Multiple-Consumers-tp15160492s2354p15160492.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at

Re: Embedded broker, network of brokers and temporary queues

2008-01-29 Thread Eric-AWL
Hi ttmdev You will find in the other answer to your question the elements you ask me. I know that all these messages can confuse you I continued my tests by making a duplex networkConnector between the client process and the two servers process. In the activemq_clt.xml !-- The store and

Howto to read out the advisory queues using the example?

2008-01-29 Thread j0llyr0g3r
Hey folks, how can i read out the advisory queues using the consumer tool provided under examples? For instance: - I start up one one consumer listening on one broker - I start up jconsole and i can look at the advisory queues - Then i thougt that running something like: ant consumer

ActiveMQ cpp/java interaction

2008-01-29 Thread bozimmerman
Hello, I've been struggling trying to mix and match the correct versions of ActiveMQ cpp and java. I needed the automatic broker discovery stuff to work for me, so I went with ActiveMQ 5.0 for java. However, then I ran into the automatic queue timeout issue, and had to jump up to 5.1 SNAPSHOT,

Re: Errors using Pure Master/Slave

2008-01-29 Thread ttmdev
I think you'll have better luck if the master and slave are connected prior to bringing up the clients. Joe Breen, Jim wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get a pure master slave configuration working. Ideally I'd like to have the brokers be persistent, but I've cut my configuration back so

Re: ActiveMQ thoughts

2008-01-29 Thread Hellweek
After spending close to 2 months trying to get ActiveMQ to work reliably we have finaly decided to give up. If some of you remember we were planning on using ActiveMQ to distribute pricing information for traders. As we were not able to get past some of the issues we have with ActiveMQ it was

Errors using Pure Master/Slave

2008-01-29 Thread Breen, Jim
Hello, I'm trying to get a pure master slave configuration working. Ideally I'd like to have the brokers be persistent, but I've cut my configuration back so that it is as simple as possible and pretty much matches the example master and slave configuration in the test code base. Still I get

RE: ActiveMQ cpp/java interaction

2008-01-29 Thread Mittler, Nathan
Hm ... not aware of any incompatibility between versions. Why don't you create a JIRA issue and provide sample Java and C++ code to recreate the problem. Nate -Original Message- From: bozimmerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:59 AM To:

RE: Errors using Pure Master/Slave

2008-01-29 Thread Breen, Jim
I forgot the attachments. Here's the config I'm using. -Original Message- From: Breen, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 12:46 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Errors using Pure Master/Slave Hello, I'm trying to get a pure master slave

Re: ActiveMQ thoughts

2008-01-29 Thread Rob Davies
Sorry to hear that - hopefully you'll get better results next time you try cheers, Rob On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Hellweek wrote: After spending close to 2 months trying to get ActiveMQ to work reliably we have finaly decided to give up. If some of you remember we were planning on

RE: Errors using Pure Master/Slave

2008-01-29 Thread Breen, Jim
Do the JDBC and Shared File System flavors of master/slave have the same limitation? -Original Message- From: ttmdev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:51 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: Errors using Pure Master/Slave I think you'll have better

RE: Errors using Pure Master/Slave

2008-01-29 Thread ttmdev
No. Performance-wise the shared approach would be the way to go because the master does not have to keep the slave sync'd up via a network replication channel. See this page http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html Joe Breen, Jim wrote: Do the JDBC and Shared File