On 8 Apr 2008, at 06:10, Keith Irwin wrote:
Folks--
If you start up various processes that use AMQ for messaging, but have
no control over the order of how the processes are started, how do you
make sure that durable subscribers which have not yet subscribed for
the first time get the messages
Folks--
If you start up various processes that use AMQ for messaging, but have
no control over the order of how the processes are started, how do you
make sure that durable subscribers which have not yet subscribed for
the first time get the messages sent to a durable topic by a
publisher?
For in
Hi,
I'm working on Entitlement with Security inheriting.
I've a setup of 6 topics:
ENTITLE-TEST-A
ENTITLE-TEST-A.ENTITLE-TEST-B1
ENTITLE-TEST-A.ENTITLE-TEST-B1.ENTITLE-TEST-C1
ENTITLE-TEST-A.ENTITLE-TEST-B1.ENTITLE-TEST-C2
ENTITLE-TEST-A.E
That works! Thanks.
Does this mean that in ActiveMQ - I can restrict access only to a group, not
to a particular user (i can have just 1 user in a group as a workaround
though)?
ttmdev wrote:
>
> In your groups.properties file, you've assigned the user "system" to the
> "admins", "tempDestina
In your groups.properties file, you've assigned the user "system" to the
"admins", "tempDestinationAdmins", and "users" groups. So in your
elements, change "system" to one of those groups.
Joe
Goto www.ttmsolutions.com for a free ActiveMQ user guide
navnetkachroo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am
We're running ActiveMQ 4.1.1 for data transfer with, currently, about 6
remote clients. We recently started getting our server scanned by ScanAlert
to get the HackerSafe logo on our web site. When they run scans against the
ActiveMQ SSL port, it causes some of the client connections with the sam
Hi,
I am trying to setup authentication using JAAS on ActiveMQ 5.0.
I'm getting an exception on startup, even after defining the user "system" :
ERROR Service- Async error occurred:
java.lang.SecurityException: User system is not authorized to read from:
ActiveMQ.Adviso
On 7 Apr 2008, at 17:30, jgunz wrote:
I dug through the website and the mailing list and am still a bit
confused...
Is there a way to set a maximum size (either by message count or
memory
size) on a specific Queue?
Is there a way to specify an eviction policy, in the way you can for
I dug through the website and the mailing list and am still a bit confused...
Is there a way to set a maximum size (either by message count or memory
size) on a specific Queue?
Is there a way to specify an eviction policy, in the way you can for slow
consumers, for a specific Queue?
What I am t
On 05/04/2008, Mohammad Reza Selim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to understand how AMQ works. Can anybody tell me how toimplement
> the following scenario. A short list of algorithmic statements is enough for
> me.
>
> The clients will work just like an e-mail client. They c
Hi James,
thanks for you prompt reply!
On Monday 07 April 2008 12:48:47 James Strachan wrote:
> > - if Camel inside ActiveMQ works out-of-the-box, why is example found at
> >
> > http://activemq.apache.org/camel/message-router.html
> >
> > throwing a Null Pointer exception during start
On 07/04/2008, Valerio VALDEZ Paolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using ActiveMQ for some time and now I'm trying to figure out how
> to leverage EIP via Camel. However, being completely new to Java and coming
> from a Perl background, I'm experiencing some difficulties even r
Hi,
I've been using ActiveMQ for some time and now I'm trying to figure out how
to leverage EIP via Camel. However, being completely new to Java and coming
from a Perl background, I'm experiencing some difficulties even running the
basic samples included along with the binary distribution of Activ
I've attached a grep of one of the consumer log files. It seems that
the derby backend may have been the problem with regard to locking.
It seems that over a period of time under high number of messages
derby gets confused.
What alternatives do I have?
My attempt to use mysql as a backend with a
Hi,
Frequently during my tests I've noticed that they complete to 99%.
That is to say that frequently one single message remains unconsumed
on the broker queue. The consumers seem fine and I don't see any
errors.
What are the usual reasons for this happening? I am using Spring
2.5.2 and ActiveM
Thanks for ur reply Sachindra, actually we create ActiveMQConnection factory
in only one place and use a pool so the connection will use that. and this
error won't pop up till we run it for some longer period. Thats why we
thought that it should have some connection with the bug.
Thanks for the
Thanks for ur reply Sachindra, actually we create ActiveMQConnection factory
in only one place, and this error won't pop up till we run it for some
longer period. Thats why we thought that it should have some connection with
the bug.
Thanks for the reply and reagards
Kalana
Sachindra Nath wrot
17 matches
Mail list logo