I read below link about producer flow control but I am still confused about
how it works when we have JDBC only persistance.
http://activemq.apache.org/message-cursors.html
I am noticing that ActiveMQ blocks even with JDBC only persistance but it
doesn't make sense to me as to why it should bloc
Hi all!
The failover transport should return normally on connection.start() even
if it cannot connect to a remote broker on startup, right?
In all cases I am trying, it blocks on startup, preventing
initialization of the rest of the ActiveMQ components.
I have filed a Jira issue on this: AMQ-211
Thanks very much for AMQ CPP. Our legacy system using the stomp library from
http://stomp.codehaus.org and write stomp frame to socket directly.
The impls of commit and abort are "COMMIT" and "ABORT" in the stomp frame
header.
With regards to "ABORT", the message acknowledge are abort and M
Hello,
I just tried something with the Netbeans memory profiler.
My assumption is:
If nothing hass been added to an application then after 2 full runs of the
Garbace Collector the memory should be the same.
In the past we have seen that memory was increasing while messages have been
processed by
We have this configuration:
- AMQ 4.1.2
- Client outside of a firewall. Uses FailoverTransport to connect to
brokers.
- Two brokers inside of firewall in master/slave configuration
Problem:
Upon startup, if the client attempts to connect to the slave broker instead
of the master broker, the firew
hello we are nitzan and tal, we are students at the universtiy for Computer
Science
we have a task to implement a simple chat room
we need to use a stomp and ActiveMQ
we started the activeMQ
and now in our "testClient" class (in C++) we wrote the folowing line to
the console
CONNECT\nlogin:foo
Hi,
The max message size use can send over HTTP is limited by max POST size
Jetty server will accept. I thinks it's 1MB by default, so it shouldn't
cause the problem you're seeing. Can you reproduce the problem reliably
(with the test case ideally) and file it as a Jira issue?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bos
Yes - it looks like there was a bug fixed in the transaction support [1] so
you would need the 2.2 release [2] of the C++ API for the transacted session
capabilities.
[1] http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-174
[2] http://activemq.apache.org/cms/activemq-cpp-22-release.html
Regards
/D
Btw:
These are my JVM settings (1.6.0_10)
# Java Additional Parameters
# note that n is the parameter number starting from 1.
wrapper.java.additional.1=-Dactivemq.home=%ACTIVEMQ_HOME%
wrapper.java.additional.2=-Dactivemq.base=%ACTIVEMQ_BASE%
wrapper.java.additional.3=-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote
Hello,
I'm working with the lastest 5.3 trunk and using the new KahaDBStore.
Last night I made a test:
I have a queue that contained >30 Mio messages. I started 20 consumers to
empty the queue.
The consumers are running in their own VM. While retrieving messages from
AMW the memory consumption of
10 matches
Mail list logo