Re: FailoverTransport stops working after a while

Hallo Murty, We also experience the same problems when using failover: Sometimes clients stop working after a slave became a master and processing a bunch of messages with this new master. And yes, we use 5.1 . We also did some testing with 5.2, unfortunately with the same result. So it looks

Get Cosumers of queues in ActiveMQ using NMS

Advisory Topics of ActiveMQ implementation using NMS (Dot net api for ActiveMQ) in C# application http://activemq.apache.org/ This document highlights to get consumers, producers list attached to activemq using NMS (dot net Api for connectivity). Unlike JMS, NMS doesn't provide such information

Re: Local and Distributed queues

Thanks for this help, I'll test that trick I've got another question on this: Is this parameter wildcard friendly ? Can I define for example that all queues named _local_foo would be the local ones ? Gary Tully wrote: check out the excludedDestinations attribute of a network xml

Re: Reconnection

Here is the code, I think can be useful to know the problem. Thanks for your help. virtual void run(){ try { // Create a ConnectionFactory string brokerURI = tcp://192.168.233.214:61616?soLinger=1soKeepAlive=true auto_ptrConnectionFactory

Re: Local and Distributed queues

Hi, sure, you can use something like excludedDestinations queue physicalName=local./ /excludedDestinations Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog -

Re: FailoverTransport stops working after a while

Hi Dejan, we use JDBC based persistant messages. But we'll give 5.3-SNAPSHOT a try anyway. Thank's for your hint. Greetings, Norbert Dejan Bosanac schrieb: Hi Norbert, this sounds like a different problem that this one. Take a look at http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2149

Re: FailoverTransport stops working after a while

Hi Norbert, this sounds like a different problem that this one. Take a look at http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2149 which is being worked on and give 5.3-SNAPSHOT a try. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action -

Re: FailoverTransport stops working after a while

Hi Murty, You don't need to provide your broker uri twice in the failover URI. If you provide only one URI it will try to reconnect after the connection failures. Can you try it like that and let us know your results? Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/

embedding ActiveMQ thanks activemq.xml without starting

Hello, I'm trying to embed ActiveMQ thanks this method call: broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(new URI(xbean:file:+conffile_), false); As far I can understand by setting the boolean startBroker to false it should not start the broker until I expressly implement the broker.start() method but

Re: embedding ActiveMQ thanks activemq.xml without starting

that seems unintended, what is the contents of you xml configuration file? There are some alternatives that may help: see: http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-embed-a-broker-inside-a-connection.html 2009/4/6 ffrenchm ffrench.mathi...@gmail.com Hello, I'm trying to embed ActiveMQ thanks this

Re: NFS locking issue for Master/Slave

Hi Jason, Thanks for posting the results and configuration to this one. I just noticed the reply :-) Glad you were able to verify nfsv4 does the job. /Dave On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:42 PM, JasonCzerak czer...@jostens.com wrote: I have found a solution!!! NFSv4. In it's default

Is it possible to setup lastImageSubscriptionRecoveryPolicy without activemq.xml configuration.

Currently I am using activemq without the activemq.xml config file. I would like to use the lastImageSubscriptionRecoveryPolicy feature with my retroactive subscription without using the configuration file. Is this possible? I'm thinking maybe tacking on something like

Could not locate data file data-topic-data-X

Hi all, I'm using ActiveMQ 5.2.0 and it has been stalling out on me recently. What happens is that after everything has been running for a while, it suddenly stops dispatching messages to a consumer. When I look in the logs I see an error saying Could not locate data file data-topic-data-25.

ActiveMQ 5.3 scope target date? (and over all project roadmap resources)

Is there some sort of target release date for a ActiveMQ 5.3 Release? What is the scope of the 5.3 release compared to 5.2? Bug fixes? Any new features/improvements? I'd also be curious to hear about any major enhancements in the area of High Availibility, specifically Pure Master/Slave (without

ActiveMQ 5.2 versus Sonic MQ 7.6

Since joining this mailing list (and subsequently snooping around in JIRA) during my evaluation of ActiveMQ 5.2, I've seen a lot of concerning messages about both new and known issues around stability and reliability in ActiveMQ. Namely, I'm concerned about broker downtime/halts, out of memory,