Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:04 -0700, Michael Dehmlow wrote:
>> According to the failover docs for Java one should use the failover
>> transport
>> listener to receive notifications that a failover has occured.
>>
>> I can not find the interface to set a failover listener
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:04 -0700, Michael Dehmlow wrote:
> According to the failover docs for Java one should use the failover transport
> listener to receive notifications that a failover has occured.
>
> I can not find the interface to set a failover listener on the
> ActiveMQConnectionFactory
According to the failover docs for Java one should use the failover transport
listener to receive notifications that a failover has occured.
I can not find the interface to set a failover listener on the
ActiveMQConnectionFactory as suggested by the documentation.
Can you do this, and how?
If
Hello All,
Is there a way to get my brokers and clients to find each other via
rendezvous, and then authenticate to each other with SSL? If so could any
one give me an example of what that configuration would look like?
Thank you,
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rendezv
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 12:59 -0700, asawilliams wrote:
> It is getting hung up in the SocketFactory::createSocket on line 137. I
> seems like the ntdll.dll might be part of the problem (it is in the call
> stack). There is a broker running, but the program seems to be running some
> code before th
It is getting hung up in the SocketFactory::createSocket on line 137. I
seems like the ntdll.dll might be part of the problem (it is in the call
stack). There is a broker running, but the program seems to be running some
code before the main() where it is getting hung up.
Timothy Bish wrote:
Hi,
We had a JVM crash today running ActiveMQ 5.2 on a linux system, Java
HotSpot(TM) Server VM (1.5.0_17-b04 mixed mode).
It's an old JVM, so I have just upgraded it to the latest 1.6 update 16
version, just in case.
Looking at the JVM error file (hs_err_pidXXX.log) this is where it went
wrong:
> Hello to everybody,
> After 4-5 hours of googling in code search, I found the solution. My
be
> this
> test code it will be useful for somebody:
You said you were doing this from batch scripts, you might find it
easier to get the in-flight-count from the command line in that case by
using the "a
I think the blocked threads were all producers. This happened in a
production system after about 6 days uptime, so I'm not sure yet if it
is reproducible. I guess I'll find out in a few days :-)
If my store usage limit is set to 1gb, then why would there be a
problem when my data folder is less th
I don't think 1112 will work for you as it is focused on queues rather than
durable subs.
Could you produce a junit test case that demonstrates your problem to see
5.3-SNAPSHOT is any better.
If not, we can see if 1112 can be morphed into a suitable solution.
2009/8/13 guptaviv
>
> Hi.
>
> We ar
Hi.
We are facing some issue in Activemq 5.2 version.
We are using durable subscriptions and setting the expiration time of 10
mins. There are two consumers which durably subscribe to a topic. The issue
is even if one of the consumer is down for a long time, the messages are not
getting expired(e
Using jconsole you should be able to examine the store usage and size.
Store disk space is released after a store checkpoint and cleanup and in
unreferenced maxDataFileSize chunks. It is not released on a per message ack
basis.
Do you have active consumers for the destinations that are waiting fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
