the manifest concerned export line is :
org.sp
ringframework.beans.factory;resolution:=optional
++
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi,
I don't see that commons-net is declared as optional package (both in pom
and in jar's manifest).
BTW. I added it to the lib/optional distribution folder
the manifest concerned export line is :
org.sp
ringframework.beans.factory;resolution:=optional
Thanks for all
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Hi,
I don't see that commons-net is declared as optional package (both in pom
and in jar's manifest).
BTW. I added it to the lib/optional distribution
Hello,
I discovered a new problem when I try to receive a JMS ObjectMessage under
felix environment.
To help you to understand my point I make a OSGI sample in which I define
two commands to execute on the felix shell:
send_obj_msg queuer_address queuer_port queue
and
receive_obj_msg
What is the intended relationship between connections, sessions, and
consumers? Is it safe to have multiple sessions on a connection? What about
multiple consumers per session?
When using transacted session acknowledge mode, the commit or rollback
operation occurs at the session level, so it
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:51 PM, mkeenankee...@p2sol.com wrote:
What is the intended relationship between connections, sessions, and
consumers? Is it safe to have multiple sessions on a connection? What about
multiple consumers per session?
It is common to create many sessions from a single
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:49 PM, mkeenankee...@p2sol.com wrote:
bsnyder wrote:
Correct, sessions should be exclusive to a specific consumer and
should not be shared at all.
Bruce, thanks for the clarification.
The reason I brought it up is that I am using Spring.NET with NMS and we
bsnyder wrote:
The reference I made to the Spring CachingConnectionFactory was for
the Spring Java APIs. Since you're working with .NET and I don't, we
should include Mark Pollack in this conversation. He's the creator and
maintainer of Spring.NET so I'll bet that he can provide some
As a JMS newbie, I am trying to get my head around ActiveMQ. It seems to me
that it could be advisable to write ActiveMQ servers and clients using
Spring technology; at least in theory, one could avoid writing lots of
boilerplate code and tying the code to any ActiveMQ vagaries... at least in
If these questions don't make much sense, please bear with me; I am just
getting into JMS.
I am interested in using ActiveMQ to develop pure JMS applications, that
will run without any J2EE container. I believe this is possible, but was
surprised to see the ActiveMQ minimal JARs include:
Let's say I have a pure JMS-based application, that implements business logic
by integrating decoupled components through messaging, with all the
advantages this entails. These applications are triggered by incoming
payloads (say, files that get dropped into specific folders).
I would also like
10 matches
Mail list logo
