On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 5:43 PM, themitchy wrote:
>
> I've followed the example in
> http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html for multicast discovery.
> I have two brokers set up that way (let's call them A and B). I'm sending
> messages to /queue/foo on broker A. I have something subsc
On 5 Sep 2009, at 00:43, themitchy wrote:
I've followed the example in
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html for multicast
discovery.
I have two brokers set up that way (let's call them A and B). I'm
sending
messages to /queue/foo on broker A. I have something subscribing
I've followed the example in
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html for multicast discovery.
I have two brokers set up that way (let's call them A and B). I'm sending
messages to /queue/foo on broker A. I have something subscribing to
/queue/foo on broker B but it doesn't get the m
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 07:27 -0700, GForce wrote:
> Hopefully I can get some assistance here for this particular issue we are
> running into. First let me provide some background. Our system is a pretty
> standard SOA system. We have both Java and C++ services attached to
> ServiceMix. We are us
Could this Camel route be used as a proxy to ActiveMQ?
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> there is a camelContext in the default activemq.xml that has a simple
> route
> configured so it is installed and ready to rock as part of a standard 5.2
> distro.
>
> refer to the camel-user list for details on camel
We are aiming to get a 5.3 release candidate to vote on next week - so
no long
On 4 Sep 2009, at 19:46, magellings wrote:
Right now we're focusing pretty hard on stress testing version 5.2
but we can
try and fit in a test. When is the estimated release date of
version 5.3?
In other word
Right now we're focusing pretty hard on stress testing version 5.2 but we can
try and fit in a test. When is the estimated release date of version 5.3?
In other words, how much time do we have? :)
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Sep 2009, at 15:14, magellings wrote:
>
>>
>> We too were having
I'll have to see if that trick works. We solved it by setting useAsyncSend =
true. We also turned off the persistent data store (kahadb) because somehow
we were getting a few messages caught in there that weren't being delivered.
Maybe using the data store plus useCache=false would work. Its hard
Could anyone tell me what edition of the 32-bit wrapper we get when we
download activemq? Hopefully the 32-bit version is community...
We are running activemq on a 64-bit windows platform and need the 64-bit
version. Could anyone let me know if using the community edition would
suffice? http:/
Hopefully I can get some assistance here for this particular issue we are
running into. First let me provide some background. Our system is a pretty
standard SOA system. We have both Java and C++ services attached to
ServiceMix. We are using Camel to route the messages around the bus. There
a
On 4 Sep 2009, at 15:14, magellings wrote:
We too were having problems were number of pending of messages was a
negative
number and messages received was greater than number sent. We
determined
there were indeed duplicate messages being sent.
We ended up setting useCache to false on the
We too were having problems were number of pending of messages was a negative
number and messages received was greater than number sent. We determined
there were indeed duplicate messages being sent.
We ended up setting useCache to false on the queue policy entry and the
problem appears to be re
Glad that book helped :)
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:47 PM, vezee wrote:
>
> Correct. Late yesterday, got some clues from "ActiveMQ In Acti
13 matches
Mail list logo
