Setting up Message level encryption

Hello, We are using ActiveMQ 5.2. I would like to know how to set up message level encryption in ActiveMQ 5.2. I could see docs on setting up SSL (transport level security) but don't see any information on setting up message level encryption. Is it possible to do it with ActiveMQ? I am re

Re: Maintaining Message Uniqueness in a Queue

As the documentation declares: "Message Groups rock!" It looks like the right thing for me, though I still have to wait for version 5.3. I can do that. Thanks a lot! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Maintaining-Message-Uniqueness-in-a-Queue-tp25660461p25665844.html Sent f

Re: Expired message - does it work?

Hi Felix, Thanks for the info, both of my producer and consumer's clocks are synced. To stop the message transfer from producer to consumer, I send a control message to produce trigger it to stop and then shutdown the consumer listener. That is why we can see some messages left on the queue

Prefetch documentation mismatch

Hi, while playing with setting the prefetch value for consumers I noticed two unclear situations: 1) From my understanding from http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html I can use the PrefetchRatePendingMessageLimitStrategy to control the connected clients prefetch limit (even they

Re: Problems with AMQ 5.2.0 [jms messages can not be read and not visible in web-console, but count is not null]

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Ivan Pryvalov wrote: > Hi Dejan, > > Thanks for your reply. > > > No, I did not try 5.3 snapshot, because I'd like to use only release > components (for stability)... btw, could you pls point me to related issues? Perhaps Dejan could be referring to these issues:

Re: Expired message - does it work?

Hi Dan, If you play with message expiration make sure that your consumer/broker/producer have the same time since the TimeTtoLive of the message is set relative to your producer. If you broker is in the future relative to your producer and the gap is greater than your TTL you won't see any messag

Re: ActiveMQ Usage

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 9:25 AM, activemq_pxe wrote: > > Thanks for reply. > I intend to develop a system which fetched Market Data from a source > (Multiple producer servers), they would push all these messages in ActiveMQ > queues, and Consumer servers would connect to ActiveMQ, and pull message

Re: Maintaining Message Uniqueness in a Queue

2009/9/29 itamara : > > hi AMQ users > > What is the best way to ensure Message Uniqueness in a Queue? > > I'm having the following architecture: > > A single Scheduler (a quartz scheduled job) is periodically checking a DB > for entities to update, for each entity-to-update it uses a single Sender

Empty MQ files at broker 2 in in the store & forward bridge mode

Hi, I’m using brokers in bridge mode(store & forward), where brokers B1 and B2 are running in separate machines, The problem I’m seeing is when ever B1 MQ consumers are up, the zero sized MQ files(as shown below)are created at B2. Since we may expect to have several ten thousands of consumers at

Re: Maintaining Message Uniqueness in a Queue

Prior to sending a message, your scheduler can use a QueueBrowser w/selector to peek at the queue and make sure a message with the same entity id as the one about to be sent doesn't already exist. Or your consumer can use a selector to fetch any other messages on the queue that have an entity id

Re: Is ActiveMQQueue really a strict FIFO queue?

The first step of solving a problem is asking the right question. (or is it acknowledging it, and the right question is only the second? :confused:) I was looking for something else. Thanks a lot for all the repliers. Your help did not go unappreciated. Please bare with me to the following thre

Maintaining Message Uniqueness in a Queue

hi AMQ users What is the best way to ensure Message Uniqueness in a Queue? I'm having the following architecture: A single Scheduler (a quartz scheduled job) is periodically checking a DB for entities to update, for each entity-to-update it uses a single Sender to send an Update Message with a

Re: ActiveBlaze

On 29 Sep 2009, at 10:53, hermain wrote: Hi, Does anyone know when ActiveBlaze will be released ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-tp25660050p25660050.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ActiveBlaze will probab

ActiveBlaze

Hi, Does anyone know when ActiveBlaze will be released ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-tp25660049p25660049.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ActiveBlaze

Hi, Does anyone know when ActiveBlaze will be released ? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveBlaze-tp25660050p25660050.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.