On 24 Oct 2009, at 04:42, skdsm wrote:
Can we set time to live for a non durable message on broker i.e. in
the
configuration file?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Time-to-live-for-non-durable-topic-message-at-broker-level-tp26035907p26035907.html
Sent from the Active
Can we set time to live for a non durable message on broker i.e. in the
configuration file?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Time-to-live-for-non-durable-topic-message-at-broker-level-tp26035907p26035907.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
> see https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1928
> This actually should be in 5.3 - need to check with bruce to see if he's
> finished so we can mark it as resolved
That issue is different and not yet complete. I need to complete the
cli
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>
>
> Actually what I meant was how to dynamically create transportConnector(s) to
> listen to a list of hosts ( ie jms client).
>
> I have looked at ServiceBroker's api, It seems I can do that, but I cannot
> remove the connectors.
>
> Also, would
Actually what I meant was how to dynamically create transportConnector(s) to
listen to a list of hosts ( ie jms client).
I have looked at ServiceBroker's api, It seems I can do that, but I cannot
remove the connectors.
Also, would creating many connectors on the fly cause any performance/memo
Dave Stanley wrote:
I think an EvictionStrategy might work. You can evict least recent or
most recent messages once your queue gets to a certain size.
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/activemq-core/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/broker/region/policy/MessageEvictionStrategy.html
MessageEvictionS
I think an EvictionStrategy might work. You can evict least recent or
most recent messages once your queue gets to a certain size.
http://activemq.apache.org/maven/activemq-core/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/broker/region/policy/MessageEvictionStrategy.html
Cheer's,
/Dave
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 6
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 22:22 -0700, Radha Manickam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Actimemq-cpp version 3.0.
> Autoconf ==> 2.64
> Automake ==> 1.11
> libtool ==> 2.2.6
> gcc ==> 4.2.3
>
> I have installed all the dependencies.
> I am able to install Apr and apr-util without any error.
> But not able
I think the brokerName in the network configuration is useful when there is
more than one bridge configured on a broker. It allows the two
networkConnectors to be differentiated. When a single network connector is
configured, the default "localhost" value (so leaving it out) will suffice.
w.r.t na
see some detail @ http://activemq.apache.org/redelivery-policy.html
2009/10/23 Alexey Romanchuk
>
> Hi, all
>
> Assume you had a queue with 3 messages in it. Consumer use transacted
> session and try to process first messages. Then he fails and call rollback
> on transaction. Is there any way t
Hi Rob,
many thanks for the very prompt and comprehensive answer, which encourages
me to venture into a second round of questions :-) ...
Hi Folks,
1\ Can someone shed some light on the actual role of the brokerName in a
network of brokers scenario? (by reading the docs it looks like it does no
can you expand on what you are seeing?
2009/10/23 Ryan Moquin
> I've had problems with the multicast discovery in activemq when a network
> connection isn't present, as well as others. Is that really an expected
> behavior? Is there any reason that activemq couldn't gracefully handle
> that
>
Using memory limits or store usage limits with an expiry time are your
options for queues at the moment. I think this requirement has been
mentioned before, especially for non persistent messages. An internal
consumer triggered off the queue size counter could do the necessary. What
sort of options
On 23 Oct 2009, at 10:16, Fred Moore wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm an IBM WebSphere MQ veteran new to ActiveMQ, I recently started
exploring ActiveMQ: great product, really great features... with some
aspects just a little bit confusing for senior citizens like me :-)
coming
from years dwelling in W
Hi, all
Assume you had a queue with 3 messages in it. Consumer use transacted
session and try to process first messages. Then he fails and call rollback
on transaction. Is there any way to configure number of retries in this
case?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
On 23 Oct 2009, at 06:32, Dan Tran wrote:
Hi instead of using the bellow config to allow all remote clients to
connect
to my embedded broker
Is there a way to programmatically create transportConnector to
allow a
limit number of remote client hosts?
Thanks
-Dan
--
Vie
Hi folks,
I'm an IBM WebSphere MQ veteran new to ActiveMQ, I recently started
exploring ActiveMQ: great product, really great features... with some
aspects just a little bit confusing for senior citizens like me :-) coming
from years dwelling in WMQ-land.
My general question here is: are there an
17 matches
Mail list logo
