James - great thanks for your replies, they were very helpful.
James Casey-2 wrote:
>
> use suppressDuplicateQueueSubscriptions="true" on the network connectors I
> normally only see one additional consumer - what is your topology ?
>
Thanks, I'm definitely gonna try this out. We have a fully
On 1 April 2010 16:04, Shyam Santhanam wrote:
>
> There are a few more observations I've made while trying to debug this.
> We've
> noticed that sometimes the messages received from the consumer queues have
> JMSDestination set to the VirtualTopic name, and at other times they have
> the consumer
There are a few more observations I've made while trying to debug this. We've
noticed that sometimes the messages received from the consumer queues have
JMSDestination set to the VirtualTopic name, and at other times they have
the consumer queue name. As shown earlier, I do have the
excludedDestin
For destination D you still need to specify a real/concrete strategy,
either individualDeadLetterStrategy or shared will work:
On 1 April 2010 10:40, Jan Dev wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.0.
> I have lots of queues. Lets say I have queue A,B,C,D
>
> Queues A,B,C should
Hi all
I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.0.
I have lots of queues. Lets say I have queue A,B,C,D
Queues A,B,C should have their own DLQ. Thus I configure the following:
For Queue "D" I don't want to have DLQ. Expired Messages shall not be kept.
So I add the following:
When I restart Act
Thanks Manuel,
I hope new MEAP update will be released soon.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:13 PM, dr_pompeii wr
