Re: Does a timeout exist for Consumers?

2010-06-16 Thread Gary Tully
use: ... On 16 June 2010 15:27, Luis Matos wrote: > > Just to add, I've also tried with: > > > > > > and > > > >

Re: sender side manual load balancing

2010-06-16 Thread Joe Fernandez
If you want the brokers to be independent of one another (i.e., they're not interconnected), then don't include networkConnectors (forwarding bridges) in their configurations. On the clients side, I think the discovery agent/connector should give you what you want. http://activemq.apache.org/d

Re: Does a timeout exist for Consumers?

2010-06-16 Thread Luis Matos
Just to add, I've also tried with: and and both give errors . an failed; n

Re: Does a timeout exist for Consumers?

2010-06-16 Thread Luis Matos
Hi Gary, First of all, thanks for the answer. In the meantime, I've tried to use the 5.4-SNAPSHOT using the maven plugin and pointing to apache.snapshots or to codehaus snapshots like this: ---

sender side manual load balancing

2010-06-16 Thread bacevt
Hi, I am trying to find the best scalability setup regarding my JMS scenario, and I would like to ask you to help me to do that. The scenario is very simple – I have a set of producers, which send thousands of persistent messages on a queue for a several seconds, as a consequence of some UI activ

Re: Securing ActiveMQ 5.3.2 Web console

2010-06-16 Thread magellings
http://old.nabble.com/Securing-the-web-console-impossible--tt16765525.html#a16784476 vbose wrote: > > I tried to follow the steps mentioned at the URL > http://www.nighttale.net/activemq/securing-activemq-531-console.html > securing-activemq-531-console to secure ActiveMQ 5.3.2 web console. B

Re: vm://localhost In memory messages

2010-06-16 Thread cmdr
Hi I tried the option broker.persistent=false. With this option when I send a message to the queue, it is not persisted. So I can't read the message after it has been send. This is the reason why I was thinking of memory persistence. Regards -- View this message in context: http://old.nabbl

Re: Fw: AMQ-cpp problem with ExceptionListener, receive and lost connection

2010-06-16 Thread Timothy Bish
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 12:30 +0100, andrew.mar...@uk.bnpparibas.com wrote: > I have developed a set of interface classes for my client-server system > that allow me to switch in either ActiveMQ or MQSeries. I have been > testing what happens when the connection is lost to the Q mgr. I have > arra

Re: help needed: heap corruption when activemq-cpp routines called

2010-06-16 Thread Timothy Bish
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 10:08 +0100, andrew.mar...@uk.bnpparibas.com wrote: > I have been seeing an intermittent heap corruption in my AMQ-cpp program, > on and of, for some time now. It happens right at the start when it calls > activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::initializeLibrary(). Unfortunately, t

Fw: AMQ-cpp problem with ExceptionListener, receive and lost connection

2010-06-16 Thread andrew . marlow
I have developed a set of interface classes for my client-server system that allow me to switch in either ActiveMQ or MQSeries. I have been testing what happens when the connection is lost to the Q mgr. I have arranged for the server to halt so that it is restarted from the script that kicks it

help needed: heap corruption when activemq-cpp routines called

2010-06-16 Thread andrew . marlow
I have been seeing an intermittent heap corruption in my AMQ-cpp program, on and of, for some time now. It happens right at the start when it calls activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::initializeLibrary(). Unfortunately, that which was intermittent is now happening every time. I am using AMQ-cpp 3.1

Re: design question about temporary queues

2010-06-16 Thread andrew . marlow
I am also looking into using an exception listener. It looks to me like this should work on the server side. Regards, Andrew Marlow Internet de...@nighttale.net Sent by: chubr...@gmail.com 16/06/2010 08:52 Please respond to users@activemq.apache.org To users@activemq.apache.org cc Subjec

Re: design question about temporary queues

2010-06-16 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi Andrew, if you want that your requests/replies survive broker crash, you can create the same solution, only using regular queues and persistent messages. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.mannin

Re: vm://localhost In memory messages

2010-06-16 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi, try something like vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:38 AM, cmdr wrote: