Re: JMS-MAP-JSON Improper Data structure

2010-07-12 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi, it must be the due to jettison version used. Can you try upgrading it to 1.2 (lib/optional folder) and see if it works for you? Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http

Re: Getting rid of DQL

2010-07-12 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi, should do the trick. Can you test it and create a test case if it doesn't? Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net

Overhead between network of brokers and direct TCP socket connection

2010-07-12 Thread Romain CHANU
Hi, I am facing an interesting case study. I have 2 systems in different geographical locations with a limited bandwidth: >From primary system (A) to secondary system (B): 64 kbps uplink >From secondary system (B) to primary system (A): 512 kbps uplink Systems A and B are in different subnets a

Re: MS Sql server Master Slave problem

2010-07-12 Thread cobrien
Hi: Set useDatabaseLock=true. -Clark www.ttmsolutions.com ActiveMQ reference guide at http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide test4john wrote: > > Client code start producing msg OK, but if stop broker A in the middle of > the loop (expect broker B will take over and continue to produce), > excepti

Getting rid of DQL

2010-07-12 Thread Konstantin Fomin
Hello, all, Can anyone share sample activemq.xml configuration with DLQ turned off? I've tried http://activemq.apache.org/message-redelivery-and-dlq-handling.html guides with no luck. -- Sincerely yours, Konstantin.

MS Sql server Master Slave problem

2010-07-12 Thread test4john
Client code start producing msg OK, but if stop broker A in the middle of the loop (expect broker B will take over and continue to produce), exception occurred: Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK__ACTIVEMQ_MSGS__7A521F79'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.ACTIVEMQ_MSGS'. at

Re: JMS-MAP-JSON Improper Data structure

2010-07-12 Thread gtsafas
Additional example {"map":[{"entry":[{"string":[8059,"N"]},{"string":[8055,"NSDQ"]},{"string":[8 -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/JMS-MAP-JSON-Improper-Data-structure-tp29140193p29143081.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

JMS-MAP-JSON Improper Data structure

2010-07-12 Thread gtsafas
I am getting an odd error in my data from my broker. Using perl I am changing a map message to json using jms-map-json. This returns an improperly structured version of my data. 'map' => [ { 'entry' => [ {

Re: what top-level JARs does ActiveMQ 5.3.2 depend on?

2010-07-12 Thread Gary Tully
A good place to look is the dependency section of the activemq-core pom http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/tags/activemq-parent-5.3.2/activemq-core/pom.xml?view=markup if you use maven, mvn dependency:tree will give you the required information for each of the modules. that information for 5.3

what top-level JARs does ActiveMQ 5.3.2 depend on?

2010-07-12 Thread bob.deremer
Hi all: We manage our own JARs and wish to remove any that are not required. What's the easiest way to get a dependency listing of all JARs that ActiveMQ 5.3.2 depends on? Thanks in advance, Bob -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/what-top-level-JARs-does-ActiveMQ-5.3.2-dep

ActiveMQQueueBrowser doesn't show pending persistent messages

2010-07-12 Thread Shaan Jayaratna
Hallo, I want to monitor pending persistent messages with the QueueBrowser. The ActiveMQ Admin page shows one pending message. But ActiveMQQueueBrowser.hasMoreElements() returns false. I have set the MessageSelector to "". Do I have to set a specific MessageSelector? I'm using ActiveMQ 5.3.

Re: Strange behavior using failover and network of broker

2010-07-12 Thread dbrondy
Hi Clark, If you do reproduce the problem, it would be great. For now, the only actions I can see to try fixing / targeting the problem are the followings : - try running our plateform using only one node (on the 4 availables) and see what occurs - try to upgrade to ACTIVEMQ 5.3.2. - try changing