Hi,
I have an issue with activemq 5.4.2 version..
where QueueBrowser.getEnumeration().next element() retrieves same messages..
any idea on this?
this was working in 5.3.2. I version
any help regarding this would be helpful..
Thanks
-ratha..
This is my code segment;
try{
c
I am doing this experiment in dev and there are no firewalls
Here is what I have concluded.
KeepAlive comes into play when the channel is inactive. In my scenario the
broker kept sending the messages.
After ~10 minutes the connection disappeared from netstat, so broker closed
the connections too
With AMQ topics, when a message is published and there are multiple
subscribers to the topic, is the message pushed in a serial order or in
parallel to subscribers?
If it's in parallel, does AMQ create a separate thread per topic subscriber?
Thanks in advance,
Mark
Hi MaryAuaun - Regarding your comment that you "removed the transacted and
commits", what exactly did you do? It may be helpful for others (like
myself) to get some more detail there, in case we can make the same change
and benefit from the performance improvement.
--
View this message in context:
Hi MaryAuaun - Regarding your comment that you "removed the transacted and
commits", what exactly did you do? It may be helpful for others (like
myself) to get some more detail there.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-and-fast-messages-tp3660295p3662968.h
Hello, I am having a problem successfully shutting down a consumer pool where
there is one outstanding job in the pool. The shutdown sequence will wait
for the job to finish, but the acknowledgement never makes it back to the
queue and thus the queue count is out of whack, here is my code (I am su
Hello, I am having a problem successfully shutting down a consumer pool where
there is one outstanding job in the pool. The shutdown sequence will wait
for the job to finish, but the acknowledgement never makes it back to the
queue and thus the queue count is out of whack, here is my code (I am su
it should not take very long but it is async.
Typically, a forwarding bridge subscribes to the consumer advisory
topic and creates local consumers on demand.
You can configure destinations that are staticallyIncluded so the
consumers for those will be created on startup.
On 12 July 2011 04:03, jes
Hi everybody,
I'm having trouble with a Camel route from ActiveMq to Weblogic.
The use case is very simple, I have a Tomcat and an ActiveMq instance on the
same server.
The application in Tomcat is posting in the local ActiveMQ and the Camel
route is forwarding the message to the queue in Webl
You need /some/ way to discriminate.
If you want elegant, rather than hack, then I think that means "Message
Selection" (chapter 3.8 in the JMS 1.1 standard.)
There are 3 namespaces here.
1) Property names which don't begin with "JMS": I would suggest an
application-specific property name such
10 matches
Mail list logo