I'm using
- Sun GlassFish Enterprise Server v2.1.1 ((v2.1 Patch06)(9.1_02 Patch12))
- activemq-rar-5.4.2-fuse-02-00.rar
- XATransaction for activemq-rar
I experience the exception below and I suspect that it is because activemqra
cannot get hold of the activemq connection after a XATransaction
... for its connection back to the originating broker when using multicast
discovery?
I keep running into problems when the discovered broker attempts to connect
back to the originating broker using a domain-name that the discovered broker
can not resolve properly. In some cases I can set -Dja
Hi,
I am experimenting with multiple consumers & shutting them down
individually.
I have a scenario where I have a consumer and someone sends something to
'testQueue'.
> broker = new BrokerService();
> broker.setBrokerName("PhillyBroker");
> broker.addConnector("tcp://localhost:61616");
> broker.
Great, thanks very much Tim!
Chris
From: tabish...@gmail.com [via ActiveMQ]
[mailto:ml-node+3668301-1868379269-252...@n4.nabble.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 2:08 PM
To: DeZago, Christopher M
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ 5.2.0 Binaries Unavailable for Download?
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 11:01 -0700,
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 11:01 -0700, CDeZago wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I currently support an application that uses Apache ActiveMQ 5.2.0. To
> better understand this tool, I am trying to download the binaries from the
> Apache website http://activemq.apache.org/
>
> I have tried all of the HTTP and FTP
Hello,
I currently support an application that uses Apache ActiveMQ 5.2.0. To
better understand this tool, I am trying to download the binaries from the
Apache website http://activemq.apache.org/
I have tried all of the HTTP and FTP Download Mirror sites listed here:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/cl
Hi Gary,
I am jumping on this thread has I find that the topic somewhat relates to an
issue I am having. Currently I have the
schedulePeriodForDestinationPurpge=6. By setting it to 0 does that stop
the purge altogether? If that is the case that it is opposite of what I am
trying to accompl
I'm looking for a decent way of managing ActiveMQ, particularly since I'm
now starting to make use of Camel.
This leads me closer to a full Java EE container which might "manage" it
all.
I've seen ServiceMix which seems ok. What others are there and can the
community make any recomendations at al
You can follow the rest of the thread here
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-ActiveMQ-to-Weblogic-route-td4578300.html
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-ActiveMQ-to-Weblogic-route-tp3661981p3667682.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
I think a quick fix is to change from calling scheduleAtFixedRate to just
calling schedule, this different being the way the interval between
executions is controlled.
For scheduleAtFixedRate which we use now execution rate is scheduled based
on the time that the task was first scheduled.
>
There is no solution yet to this issue.
The AMQ connection is not participating in the distribution transaction.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/The-resource-is-allready-being-used-in-transaction-context-tp3544709p3667665.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User m
it disables automatic purging of destinations that have no active
consumers/producers, it is a short circut override of the policy
entry.
http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html
On 14 July 2011 14:40, James Green wrote:
> What does schedulePeriodForDestinationPurge=0 do prec
What does schedulePeriodForDestinationPurge=0 do precisely?
On 14 July 2011 11:30, Gary Tully wrote:
> That looks like a memory leak. There is a potential issue with
> inactive destination deletion that has been resolved on trunk that can
> be worked around by setting schedulePeriodForDestinatio
Two questions/suggestions regarding your AMQ setup:
1) What is the average size (or range of sizes) of the actual message being
sent from your producer? If you are dealing with larger messages you may wish
to consider sending Blob Messages instead of putting the entire payload inside
of the me
That looks like a memory leak. There is a potential issue with
inactive destination deletion that has been resolved on trunk that can
be worked around by setting schedulePeriodForDestinationPurge=0 on the
broker element in xml configuration.
Otherwise we need to track down the component that is us
hmm, that sounds like a reasonable theory... seems like a scheduled
executor is the answer or a scheduler that uses cpu relative time...
so that sleep time is ignored.
Can you raise a jira issue to track this, there are a few schedulers
in the code base, so they may all need the same treatment.
O
I have a problem whereby the ActiveMQ broker crashes when my system has been
running for more than ~6 hours. By "crashes" I mean it's still running but
won't allow any sending/receiving of messages and needs to be restarted.
Here's my setup:
ActiveMQ 5.5.0 with the out-of-the-box configuration, ex
17 matches
Mail list logo
