Re: Specifying a timeout for producer

2011-11-28 Thread kaustubh khasnis
thanks --Kaustubh On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Yuvaraj Vanarase yuvaraj.vanar...@synechron.com wrote: Sender does have timeout. ActiveMQQueueSender Regards, Yuvaraj Yuvaraj Vanarase, Lead Technology - Software Phone: +91.20.40262000 Ext 2305|Mobile: +91.9850818870 |

Re: About the efficiency of the consumer creation.

2011-11-28 Thread Gary Tully
are you already caching connections? That will help a bit. What version are you on? there was some contention over an internal destination map that could be causing some trouble, a few periodic thread dumps of the broker would help identify if that is the problem. see:

Producer Flow Control best practices

2011-11-28 Thread Ishitori
I've encountered a problem of hanging up of the producers and I found that it is related to Producer Flow Control. I made a quick fix via disabling producerFlowControl at all. But now I wonder what should I do, because I don't really want producers to use all available disk space. The questions

Re: tcp retransmission with activemq 5.3.x

2011-11-28 Thread Torsten Mielke
Hello, Have seen these as well in the past. This should all come from your OS, not from ActiveMQ. Its tcp level retransmission of tcp packets. Higher network layers should not even see these. Typically this happens on dodgy network connection, but AFAIK can also happen if your connection

Re: ActiveMQ 5.5 fails to start

2011-11-28 Thread Torsten Mielke
Is your wrapper.conf setup correctly? Does the account that ActiveMQ is being started under have read access to the ActiveMQ installation? What OS are you running on? Torsten Mielke tors...@fusesource.com tmie...@blogspot.com On Nov 25, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Christopher Johnston wrote: The

Re: ActiveMQ 5.5 fails to start

2011-11-28 Thread Christopher Johnston
I actually got this working on Friday by changing to use root, so I am thinking there is a permission problem somewhere. I need to do a bit more testing today to see where or what file it can not access. Strangely I had no problems getting this going on Fedora 14, but on Fedora 10 I had issues.

Re: Producer Flow Control best practices

2011-11-28 Thread Torsten Mielke
On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:34 PM, Ishitori wrote: I've encountered a problem of hanging up of the producers and I found that it is related to Producer Flow Control. I made a quick fix via disabling producerFlowControl at all. But now I wonder what should I do, because I don't really want

ActiveMQ 5.3.1 release notes

2011-11-28 Thread joe7pak
Hi - I'm unable to find the release notes for ActiveMA 5.3.1. Does anyone have a link? If I do it through the ActiveMQ website, I just get a The selected version does not exist message. I've googled, I've downloaded the distribution ( no love ), I've tried non-ActiveMQ links. I can't find them

Re: ActiveMQ 5.5 fails to start

2011-11-28 Thread Christopher Johnston
Turned out to be a permission problem in my package, the top level directory had permission to only allow root to access it so once I stated drilling down I was able to pin point it. -Chris On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Christopher Johnston chjoh...@gmail.comwrote: I actually got this

Re: ActiveMQ 5.3.1 release notes

2011-11-28 Thread Gary Tully
JIRA should have all the detail: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210version=12315621 On 28 November 2011 18:49, joe7pak bill.s...@pobox.com wrote: Hi -   I'm unable to find the release notes for ActiveMA 5.3.1. Does anyone have a link? If I do it through

ActiveMQ thread usage

2011-11-28 Thread Jason Dillon
How accurate is this document wrt ActiveMQ 5.5.1? Is there a better place to find relevant details about thread usage/meaning/configuration? http://fusesource.com/wiki/display/ProdInfo/Understanding+the+Threads+Allocated+in+ActiveMQ I see threads with names like: ActiveMQ Transport tcp:...

Re:Re: About the efficiency of the consumer creation.

2011-11-28 Thread lzr
I make 3 threads in my program and each maintain a Connection. There are four queues in my flow, two for request and two for response. At 2011-11-28 19:18:27,Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote: are you already caching connections? That will help a bit. What version are you on? there was

Re:Re:Reply:Re:re:About the efficiency of the consumer creation.

2011-11-28 Thread lzr
Here comes more performance test information: Without transaction, I can perform the flow about 500 times per second. With transaction, it's only 20 times per second. At 2011-11-29 09:35:30,lzr jsw...@163.com wrote: Thanks a lot for your timely response! I'll try it again following up your