Re: TempQueue advisory flood

2012-05-16 Thread Gary Tully
sorry, yes, there is one more piece to the puzzle. The temp destinations need to have a well known naming convention and there needs to be a wildcard static include in the network bridge to have matching destinations propagated. Have a look at the test case to see an example of the xml config requ

Re: TempQueue advisory flood

2012-05-16 Thread Chris Robison
So I tried that and the client appears to be sending just fine, but the producer on the other side of the network connector that expects to hear back via the temp queue is not receiving the message. Chris On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Gary Tully wrote: > you need one additional bit of config

Re: Wireshark packet dissection - Openwire

2012-05-16 Thread metatech
mickhayes wrote > > Wondering if anyone has a wireshark plugin or similar for the OpenWire > protocol that they are willing to share? > Hi Michael, Yes Wireshark supports the OpenWire protocol. You need the "development version", and least version 1.7.1. Please share any findings, problems, e

Consumption order on hierarchical queues using wildcards

2012-05-16 Thread mwessel
I have a question concerning the consumption process on hierarchical queues in combination with wildcards. Defined Queues: "A.B.C.D" Subscribers subscribes to "A.B.>" Now messages are published to C and D. In which order does the subscriber receive the messages? First all messages from C and th

Re: TempQueue advisory flood

2012-05-16 Thread Gary Tully
you need one additional bit of config, to disable the connection from tracking temp destination advisories so that it allows the request to go to the broker. factory.setWatchTopicAdvisories(false); or ?jms.watchTopicAdvisories=false on the connection factory broker url On 15 May 2012 23:30, Chris