Hi,
thanks for your hints ...
To delete the inactive Queue is a good idea. I would like to set the check
period to 2 days instead of soconds .. is it OK?
best regards
Shine
--
View this message in context:
Are you using 5.6.0?
-
Michael Hayes B.Sc. (NUI), M.Sc. (DCU), SCSA SCNA
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/leveldb-messages-lost-tp4653078p4653086.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The JMS 1.1 spec is worth a look here.
http://download.oracle.com/otndocs/jcp/7195-jms-1.1-fr-spec-oth-JSpec/
Sections 4.4.12 Duplicate Delivery of Messages
and 4.4.13 Duplicate Production of Messages cover the issue.
Note the comment on client usage of AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE - such clients must
You can achieve automatic client reconnect by using the failover transport.
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
Then your client will attempt to reconnect transparently and when
successful, messages (in this case the messages are logs) can be sent to the
broker.
-
Hi,
Try replacing the fusemq-leveldb jar with the following snapshot. That
should take care of the 'NotYetImplemented exception'.
Some time ago a patch was submitted to create a lightweight set of
dependencies for people who are just writing a simple client -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-1703
This was also discussed at
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-client-without-Spring-td3178034.html
By my
My problem is the following: I have written an interceptor for an
activemq5.5.1 message broker. The interceptor intercepts incoming messages
by overriding the
*public void send(ProducerBrokerExchange producerExchange, Message
messageSend)*
method in Broker filter. It then validates the messages
You would have to use an MQTT specific api to access the MQTT protocol. A
java API to MQTT can be found at: http://mqtt-client.fusesource.org/
These is no JMS API to the MQTT protocol AFAIK.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Dmytro Pishchukhin
dmytro.pishchuk...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm
Do you think we could have done something in the ActiveMQ startup scripts
to protect against even odd environments like the one you encountered?
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:43 AM, justintime jus...@techadvise.com wrote:
My apologies, it's something on the system, not in the code. That'll teach
What would be cool is if we can use the proguard-maven-plugin to byte
code analyze the absolute minium client jar that is needed.
We could also shave off lots of bytes if we drop support for older broker
version from the client jar. Right now a client includes something like 9
versions of
I've found several posts about this issue, but only a few answers, and I was
not able to resolve my problem with those answers.
I'm trying to understand why the pending message count on the ActiveMQ admin
page can have a positive value (approx 50,000 in our case) while it appears
the queue is
I am running ActiveMQ 5.6 on Java 6 on Ubuntu 11.10 inside Tomcat 6. I have a
Master-Slave shared file system setup with Kaha DB and Spring 3.0.6. I just
restarted my Tomcat server and I just started seeing TONS of messages
similar to the following ones:
00:15:28,566 DEBUG ActiveMQSession:559 -
12 matches
Mail list logo