Not that I know of. Once acked, the broker can safely forget about
that message. Allowing a broker to store messages perpetually would
defeat the purpose of a messaging broker and turn it into a database.
Here's a post that dives deep into consumer acks. You may find it
useful:
Is the destination a topic or a queue? If it's a topic, have you considered
using retroactive consumers with a timed subscription recovery policy [2]
set to 6 minutes?
[1] http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html
[2] http://activemq.apache.org/subscription-recovery-policy.html
i know i can i that. but what i looking for is a Dynamic ACL solution,
that means
i can decide who can access a resource base on some settings saved on my db.
is there any way to do this?
在 2012-8-10，4:09，Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.com 写道：
add:
access_rule allow=12345 action=receive
Yes, you need to bind the plugin to the goal/phase at hand with multiple
execution / elements. Each execution contains its own configuration.
Take a look at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7239786/how-to-invoke-the-same-maven-build-twice-in-one-call
.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
*Raúl
What version of AMQ are you testing against?
Have you tried attaching another consumer after running your test which
leaves 10 messages behind? If you have, those 10 messages stay put in the
broker?
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
*Principal Consultant | FuseSource Corp.
r...@fusesource.com |
Emergint has been using ActiveMQ for a number of years now in our health care
consulting efforts. We have been greatly pleased with its stability and
performance, particularly version 4.1.2. We are planning to move some
capabilities from a locally-hosted environment to the cloud where we need
The one way to you can do it today is to start up apollo as embedded broker
so that you can programatic control of it's configurations. You can find
an example of this at:
Well, you could also just run a process which writes a new apollo.xml file
with the ACL rules queried from the DB periodically but then your updating
your disk constantly which is not as ideal.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Hiram Chirino hi...@hiramchirino.comwrote:
The one way to you can do
Ah, good articles, and now I know how I shouldn't do it, but still
not sure how to solve my problem.
I responded to Dejan's article...
Thanks for the help! Another reply is forthcoming on the second
reply you sent me.
Mark
On 8/10/2012
Ah, this sounds like the solution I've been seeking!! I'll have to
try this out! If it works, you must be an angel from the Almighty!
(It's a Topic, BTW.)
Mark
On 8/10/2012 4:52 AM, Raul Kripalani
[via ActiveMQ] wrote:
Is the
Yes, your suggestion works, and you *are* an angel!! I have just one simple
follow-up question. I have one ActiveMQ instance brokering two separate
topics. I want to set one topic (with many large messages) with a
timedSubscriptionRecoveryPolicy of 6 minutes, while the other topic has much
I have this web application that currently connects to a stand alone broker
to place messages and consumer only nodes pick up and process the messages.
I want to move this to have embedded brokers on each web app and each
consumer and those embedded brokers should forward their messages to a stand
12 matches
Mail list logo
