Hi -
I would like to connect to the ActiveMQ broker from my HTTP session in
my web application (PHP/Apache). Moreover, I want to reuse the HTTP
session credentials to connect into the ActiveMQ broker. I believe there is
something similar in http://activemq.apache.org/resource-adapter.html. But
Thanks, got it working with single broker and producer running at unix
machine and just consumer running at windows.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-not-receiving-message-tp4655259p4655264.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list arch
Per your original message: "Brokers at both producer and consumer are
running as java embedded brokers"
So, you don't need two embedded brokers for passing the same message
between a producer and a consumer. Just run a single broker on a machine
that is accessible to the unix-producer and the wind
Thanks Gaurav for replying.
Yes I checked that. Its working in the same JVM scenario. It is also working
when both the machines are windows. I am having trouble while running the
producer at Unix machine.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-not-recei
Hi Poorva, you can do with just a single broker (on the same jvm, forked or
remote) and producers and consumers as 'clients' of the broker.
For absolute simplicity, consider the broker as a pipe/container with
producer-push and consumer-pull or consumer-push (via messagelistener) like:
producer ->
I am running producer at Unix machine and consumer at Windows machine.
The producer is sending the messages but they are not getting received at
consumer.
It all works fine when producer is also running on windows machine with the
same configuration.
Brokers at both producer and consumer are runni
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 12:22 -0700, bryce wrote:
> I might try to post some test code later. For now...
>
> Does failover work with SSL?
>
> I ask because once I disable SSL it works fine.
>
Its just work just fine with SSL, that's why a test case would be of use
here.
>
>
> --
> View thi
I might try to post some test code later. For now...
Does failover work with SSL?
I ask because once I disable SSL it works fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Certificate-unknown-error-AFTER-failover-enabled-tp4655212p4655257.html
Sent from the Activ
Hi,
can you create a test case that demonstrates it and raise a Jira?
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
Senior Software Engineer | FuseSource Corp.
dej...@fusesource.com | fusesource.com
skype: dejan.bosanac | twitter: @dejanb
blog: http://www.nighttale.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyd
hello,
I can not get my local environment to run when I upgraded from 5.5.1 to
5.6.0. Seems like the system tries to automatically connect to a broker
(which I've added with a phony protocol-name to prevent it from actually
connect). In 5.5.1 it did not seem to try to connect automatically, but in
Hi,
we are using ActiveMQ 5.6.0 resource adapter to send messages to an ActiveMQ
broker. According to the documentation and examples,
ActiveMQConnectionFactory/ActiveMQConnection allows to configure the desired
redelivery policy for example.
The problem is that when using ActiveMQ resource adapter,
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 23:20 -0700, mkeysman wrote:
> I have tried to incorporate the simpleproducer.cpp program into another c++
> program. Compiling in windows fails due to a trio of unresolved external
> symbol errors:
>
> 1>libsvmactivemqSink.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
>
12 matches
Mail list logo