Re: Modifying consumed message (AcvtiveMQ-CPP)

2012-08-31 Thread spam trap
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:40:18 -0400, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 12:44 +0100, spam trap wrote: On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:08:36 -0400, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 15:04 +0100, spam trap wrote: On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:46:18

Re: starvation with JMSPriority queues

2012-08-31 Thread Gary Tully
that is really the point of a priority queue, to starve out low priority messages in favor of higher priority. There is currently no way to tell amq; every now and again let some lower priority messages through. It begs lots of questions and it would be quite complex to achieve :-) Priority

Re: Modifying consumed message (AcvtiveMQ-CPP)

2012-08-31 Thread Timothy Bish
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 10:08 +0100, spam trap wrote: On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:40:18 -0400, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 12:44 +0100, spam trap wrote: On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:08:36 -0400, Timothy Bish tabish...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-29 at

Logging DLQ messages

2012-08-31 Thread gaurav.seth
Is there any way to log messages that got trapped in DLQ in logs? How I can be notified when a message get stored in DLQ, do I need to write some thread class? Thanks Regards, Gaurav Seth -- View this message in context:

ActiveMQ.DLQ vs Individual dead letter queues

2012-08-31 Thread gaurav.seth
What all messages land in ActiveMQ.DLQ and what all in Individual dead letter queues. What configuration we need to do in activemq.xml file to do that? I have following entries in my activemq.xml file and my dead messages are getting stored in DLQ.wfc.notifications.router: destinationPolicy

Re: Logging DLQ messages

2012-08-31 Thread Torsten Mielke
You could register a topic listener on your DLQ and consume and process the message when it gets send to the DLQ. Alternatively you can have an advisory msg generated whenever a msg is moved to DLQ. See http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html, properties

Re: ActiveMQ.DLQ vs Individual dead letter queues

2012-08-31 Thread Torsten Mielke
Hello, With the configuration below any queue msgs being moved to a DLQ will end up on the corresponding individual dead letter queue. If you also have durable topic subscriber, then the failure to deliver msgs to these subscribers after 6 redelivery attempts could cause these messages to be

Re: ActiveMQ - IDLE SCEP@ message

2012-08-31 Thread Gary Tully
seems to be jetty related but have not tracked it down to a version http://www.codingtiger.com/questions/jetty/mysterious-console-output-to-stderr-from-jetty.html On 30 August 2012 17:30, boday ben.o...@initekconsulting.com wrote: I'm also seeing this message frequently after upgrading from

[ANNOUNCE] Apache.NMS.Stomp v1.5.3 Released

2012-08-31 Thread Timothy Bish
Hello The Apache.NMS.Stomp 1.5.3 Release bundle is now available on the Apache.NMS site: http://activemq.apache.org/nms/apachenmsstomp-v153.html This release is based on the Apache.NMS API v1.5.1 and runs on .NET and .NETCF frameworks 2.0+ and Mono 2.0+. This is a bugfix release that adds

Re: starvation with JMSPriority queues

2012-08-31 Thread boday
thanks Gary...that makes sense...I just thought I'd check to see if there was some built-in mechanism to handle this case...indefinite starvation is a common concern for this pattern, but tricky to implement as you stated. for now, I suppose I can periodically check the queue for old messages