Re: KahaDB corruption

2013-06-12 Thread Gary Tully
If the filesystem is corrupted, there is not much one can do. ignoreMissingJournalfiles should really be called ignoreCorruptJournalRecords. A Journal record is the unit of data written to the journal in one sequential write. If a unit cannot be read (the read values don't match their checksum)

Re: Understanding memoryLimits with flow control and systemUsage limits.

2013-06-12 Thread Jesus Roncero
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 03:55:29PM -0400, Christian Posta wrote: So it looks like its working as expected. In both cases (producer flow control on or off) you won't reach your memory limits because the pending cursor is spooling to disk. So looks sane to me. Ah, brilliant. So my

Failover emits unwanted message on closing

2013-06-12 Thread fenbers
Due to ongoing network issues, we find it necessary to reboot ActiveMQ occasionally. Previously, clients had to be started as well to reestablish a connection with the newly rebooted broker. So now I implemented the failover feature so that the clients can automatically reconnect with the broker

Re: KahaDB corruption

2013-06-12 Thread victorhdamian
Try this: ActiveMQ v5.5.1 Corrupt data log found recovery: Symptom: The ActiveMQ slave process died and will not restarted. Root Cause: Corrupt data log found Root Cause verification: Search the affected ActiveMQ log file for the following entries in sequence: Corrupt journal records found

ActiveMQ systemUsage configuration.

2013-06-12 Thread vamsikrishna_tsss
Hi , I am using Activemq 5.8.0 I have a doubt regarding the systemUsage configuration in activemq.xml , here is my doubt.. If I do not mention anything about the systemUsage it is taking the default limit values for memoryUsage, storeUsage, tempUsage. And my requirement is I just want to

Temporary Topic not forwarding responses as expected

2013-06-12 Thread kpoxmq
Setup: ActiveMQ 5.8.0, API: ctivemq-cpp-3.7.0I have a 2-broker NOB setup, and configured duplex network connectors for topic a.b.c on broker1. A server process on broker1 publishes to the a.b.c using a Producer and specifies a ReplyTo destination which is a temporary topic created within the AMQ

Apollo Stomp Message Priority

2013-06-12 Thread darrenw2112
Sending a STOMP message using Apollo with priority:int in the header has no effect. Does anyone know if this is something that should be working or a feature that will be added in the future? Thanks, Darren -- View this message in context:

Changing disk location of tempUsage

2013-06-12 Thread fenbers
I get an eror on AMQ startup that I request 1gb of temporary store limit but only 500mb are available on ${activemq_home}/data/localhost/tmp_storage I read many googled pages, but found nothing on how to change the location of this storage. Does anyone know? -- View this message in context:

Re: ActiveMQ systemUsage configuration.

2013-06-12 Thread Christian Posta
Not at the moment. When you specify the systemUsage objects, you must specify all components. If you'd like to change it, please open a JIRA and submit a patch. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, vamsikrishna_tsss vamsikrishna_t...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi , I am using Activemq 5.8.0 I have a

Re: Temporary Topic not forwarding responses as expected

2013-06-12 Thread Christian Posta
I don't see your configs or sample code, did you forget to add them? On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 3:49 PM, kpoxmq k...@sogetthis.com wrote: Setup: ActiveMQ 5.8.0, API: ctivemq-cpp-3.7.0I have a 2-broker NOB setup, and configured duplex network connectors for topic a.b.c on broker1. A server

Re: Changing disk location of tempUsage

2013-06-12 Thread Paul Gale
The 'tmpDataDirectory' attribute on the broker tag can specify the location of the temp storage. Example: broker tmpDataDirectory=${activemq.data}/tmp_storage /broker Thanks, Paul On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:27 PM, fenbers mark.fenb...@noaa.gov wrote: I get an eror on AMQ startup that I

Re: Apollo Stomp Message Priority

2013-06-12 Thread Christian Posta
Will definitely be added :) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APLO-108 On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 11:38 AM, darrenw2112 darrenw2...@yahoo.com wrote: Sending a STOMP message using Apollo with priority:int in the header has no effect. Does anyone know if this is something that should be

JMS 2.0 alignment

2013-06-12 Thread guerra
Hi, I was just wondering about the JMS 2.0 alignment. Is there any news about the JMS 2.0 support? Thank you -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-2-0-alignment-tp4668129.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Apollo Stomp Message Priority

2013-06-12 Thread darrenw2112
Great. Thanks, Darren -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apollo-Stomp-Message-Priority-tp4668120p4668132.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.