Thanks. We are considering upgrade to 5.8.0.
Are there any potential risk associated with upgrade?
Or any precautions we need to take while upgrading to 5.8.0?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Help-for-small-customization-tp4668853p4670114.html
Sent from
Hi,
yes by default web socket spec defines same-origin policy and it's enforced
by web server (Jetty in this case). I just found out that there's a filter
that can be used to avoid this
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Feature/Cross_Origin_Filter
so maybe we can make it configurable.
Regards
--
i want to
Config ActiveMQ single consumer multiple producers used queue
Thank for help me
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Config-ActiveMQ-single-consumer-multiple-producers-used-queue-tp4670119.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
We have a use case where there is a single queue that has multiple message
consumers. It is important that the messages are consumed in
first-in-first-out order and message consuming must stop when a message
cannot be acknowledged (e.g. due to an application/database error) and must
not be resumed
Hi all,
I am using apache activemq 5.2.0 with ibm java 1.6
My question is , can i continue to use this on Oracle java 1.7?Will there be
any issues if i make the change?
Venkat
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Apache-5-2-0-tp4670106.html
Sent from the
I do a number of request/response type operations where I send a
request and I create a temporary queue.
What is the lifecyle of a temporary queue ? At what point does it get
destroyed ?
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
--
Regards,
Oleg Dulin
http://www.olegdulin.com
a temp destination is tied to the lifecycle of a connection, unless it
is destroyed via javax.jms.TemporaryQueue#delete it will be deleted
when the connection closes
On 6 August 2013 14:52, Oleg Dulin oleg.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I do a number of request/response type operations where I send a
I think you're on the right track. As long as you're using exclusive
consumer, only one consumer will be actively consuming from the queue at a
time. You could use individual ack, or you could also use transacted
sessions. By not sending the ack back, your consumer will not proceed to
the next
Give a quick google for how to do this.
And check out the samples that come with the distribution.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:30 AM, dungvv vuvandung861...@gmail.com wrote:
i want to
Config ActiveMQ single consumer multiple producers used queue
Thank for help me
--
View this message in
Perfect, thank you sir.
On 2013-08-06 15:25:16 +, Gary Tully said:
a temp destination is tied to the lifecycle of a connection, unless it
is destroyed via javax.jms.TemporaryQueue#delete it will be deleted
when the connection closes
On 6 August 2013 14:52, Oleg Dulin
oleg.du...@gmail.com
oscarp wrote
Hi all,
Im trying to use ActiveMQ with IPV6 but Im running into some problems. I'm
in debian linux, and seems that ActiveMQ(5.5.1) is up and listening IPV6.
tcp6 0 0 :::61616 :::* LISTEN 24671/java
I can make a ping and a telnet to ::1 61616 and
Thanks Matthew for circling back with the solution to this!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:58 AM, MattG987 mattg...@gmail.com wrote:
oscarp wrote
Hi all,
Im trying to use ActiveMQ with IPV6 but Im running into some problems.
I'm
in debian linux, and seems that ActiveMQ(5.5.1) is up and
Yup, it turns out there was a logic error in app2 causing this problem. As
for app1 hitting producer flow control, it's not normally expected, but it
was a frequent occurrence recently given the increased load on app2.
Thanks for your help.
ceposta wrote
You may want to also look at app2 and
there is no way to automatically clean them up? If not, ts there a way to
look up the existing message group and run some type of a clean up code?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JMS-message-Groups-Short-living-groups-tp4670060p4670138.html
Sent from the
14 matches
Mail list logo
