Hey Tim,
Did you get a chance to look at this ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/javax-jms-InvalidClientIDException-for-durable-subscription-on-broker-restart-tp4684381p4684429.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'd suspect that you'd have storage corruption issues. Why not use store
and forward over network connectors between the two brokers. The internal
broker can open the network connection in duplex mode to allow message
transfer from the DMZ broker.
On Aug 12, 2014 4:27 AM, "Chainbuck" wrote:
>
>
Hi user group:
If you ever want to run activemq under daemontools control you cannot simply
use
/opt/activemq/bin/activemq start in your run script.
If you use the normal start you will notice a defunct process every second or
so and it can drive you nuts.
If you setup activemq to be under daemo
Hey,
I am also facing the same problem during my test.
Have you been able to find a fix for this ???
Please share...
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/help-WHY-Cannot-remove-a-consumer-that-had-not-been-registered-tp2542385p4684305.html
Sent from the Acti
Hello,
I'd like to know if the following architecture is feasible. My main goal is:
open only ports going out of the internal network; no communication
initiated from DMZ.
Scenario of an incoming message
| D M Z| I N T E R N A L |
| |
Below is my log4j.properties sample which I am using for my Test.
I have declared two variables (DATE,CURRENT_TIME) which stores some hard
coded values(see the sample). And, i am using those variables which creating
my activemq log file.
So, in the normal scenario, when I start my activemq broker
Hi
I am bit novice in Active MQ domain and would like some expert advice.
Problem is
APP Servers > Queuing Servers --> Database
Our APP servers (producers) write data into Active MQ on Queuing servers,
There is process called Infostore which consumes the message from MQ and
puts the me
Jon-
First question—
A. Is the goal to get the same message to all users? ie.. 100 messages each go
to 10 users.
B. Is it to get the correct subset of messages to each user? ie.. 100
messages, 10 different message to 10 users.
For A, you want Topics, or Virtual Topics
For B, you want som
Please respond
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/javax-jms-InvalidClientIDException-for-durable-subscription-on-broker-restart-tp4684381p4684406.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Something to keep in mind— different clustering options provide different
capabilities. Network of Brokers provides scaling, reduced latency for the
“next” message to be processed (fault tolerance), while Master-Slave / LevelDB
replication provide high availability of messages that have yet to b
You have better management and control (multi-threading, throttling, logging,
etc) over using a Camel route vs ActiveMQ’s JMS bridge. Camel is very
lightweight, so I wouldn’t expect it to have any measurable performance impact
in real world scenarios.
On Jul 25, 2014, at 8:44 PM, pminearo wrot
The command line uses the JMX service as well. Another option is to use a
destination policy for “garbage collection”. ActiveMQ has the ability to
automatically delete unused destinations:
http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html
On Aug 4, 2014, at 9:48 AM, rajashreekhare w
Hi,
In my case I am creating 6 listeners in my application using different
spring DMLC.
So In this case should
1) I use 1 pooledConnectionFactory with "maxConnection" = 6
OR
2) different pooledCOnnectionFactory for each listener.
Thanks,
Anuj
--
View this message in context:
http://ac
On 08/11/2014 09:57 AM, khandelwalanuj wrote:
Hi,
No only one application is running on the host.
Yes I am using pooled connection factory. This is how my connection factory
looks liks:
jmsFactory*"
class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory"
destroy-method
Hi,
No only one application is running on the host.
Yes I am using pooled connection factory. This is how my connection factory
looks liks:
jmsFactory*"
class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory"
destroy-method="stop">
On 08/11/2014 06:24 AM, khandelwalanuj wrote:
Hi,
I am seeing a weird issue:
when I restart the ActiveMQ broker a *durable subscriber client* is not able
to connect to the broker showing "InvalidClientIDException".
*Exception:
*Failed to add Connection ID:gbo5.nyc.xyz.com-36751-1407746385464-11
Hai ,
I am using Apache Apollo Message Broker 1.7 .Currently, am using
libmosquitto library in C for MQTT PUB/SUB which is not at all suitable for
my application. MQTT Paho C Library suites perfectly .. but unfortunately
Apollo doesnt support those. can anyone suggest me another alternative ..
Th
Can someone please check. It is affecting my production setup.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/javax-jms-InvalidClientIDException-for-durable-subscription-on-broker-restart-tp4684381p4684382.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabb
Hi,
I am seeing a weird issue:
when I restart the ActiveMQ broker a *durable subscriber client* is not able
to connect to the broker showing "InvalidClientIDException".
*Exception:
*Failed to add Connection ID:gbo5.nyc.xyz.com-36751-1407746385464-11:6
javax.jms.InvalidClientIDException: Broker:
19 matches
Mail list logo
