Hi Tim,
I appreciate your efforts, but it really doesn't make sense for me (and you) to
try to debug the issue on an environment that's 7+ years old. It's really on
me to get the production system updated, I'm working on development environment
now, which is where my questions come from. Don'
What do you mean by "cluster"? Network of brokers? Master/slave pair?
Something else?
What's your configuration? Your persistence store?
Thanks for including the version number, but you left out a lot of other
information if you want advice about performance (which is the hardest
thing to give
Yes, as long as that's on the subscription, not the topic itself. Caveat:
I haven't actually looked at JMX in 5.3.2, so I'm extrapolating from what
I've seen in later versions, but I think that should be right.
On Aug 24, 2015 1:29 PM, "Daniel Israel" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/21/15, 5:28 AM, "tba
I tested again with the storeUsage limit set to 32 mb (Please have a look at
my previous reply to learn about the results I got with 2 mb as storeUsage).
Not much difference. The producer is stopped on hitting the storeUsage
limit.
And here's my relevant activemq configuration:
>From this may
hi all，
I use two build distributed cluster configuration is the same machine,
activemq.xml is same.
After I find the cluster message per second speed is slower than the single
machine will be many, is this why? Or how to improve the speed of
communication between the two servers?
Thanks.
--
Vie
Hi Tim,
I couldn't even send 1000 messages using jms.asyncSend=true (my payload
being 2k) with the storeLimit of 2 mb. And there is no hint whatsoever about
the per-destination memory limit of 1 mb I set. Here are the logs for your
reference.
And here's my activemq configuration (I'm sharing on
Hi Daniel,
I guess you are getting the exception in your producer and you are sending
messages asynchronously. Is this right?
It would be helpful if you share your activemq.xml configuration here.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/User-Memory-Issues-tp47011
On 8/21/15, 5:28 AM, "tbai...@gmail.com on behalf of Tim Bain"
wrote:
>You can tell if a consumer is slower than the rest via JMX. Look at each
>subscription for the topic and see if any of them has lots of pending
>messages while the rest do not.
Is that the PendingQueueSize on the JMX
PLease create a new JIRA to update the version and we can get to it.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/OSGi-ClassNotFoundException-when-trying-to-upgrade-from-5-11-1-to-5-12-0-tp4701124p4701325.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
It seems a newer commons-pool2 (introduced with AMQ-5721) will fix this.
Martin Lichtin wrote
> Has anyone tried upgrading to 5.12.0 under OSGi (e.g. Karaf) already?
> It fails for me with
>
> org.osgi.service.blueprint.container.ComponentDefinitionException: Error
> setting property: PropertyDe
At this time I think they are synchronous. They are persistent messages so
this would be the default I think. At one time we specified asynchronous but
it looks like that has been removed.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-pauses-sending-to-consumers-t
This git
link(https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/blob/master/examples/jms/stomp1.1/src/main/resources/activemq/server0/broker.xml)
is down.
Mine is like this.
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns="urn:activemq"
xsi:schemaLocation="urn:activemq /
12 matches
Mail list logo
