I'd definitely expect that turning off JMX would eliminate the problem,
since the issue happens when creating the objects JMX uses. I'm skeptical
that scheduler support would cause this problem if JMX support is disabled,
and skeptical that turning it off would eliminate the problem if JMX is
enab
I try the default configuration for ActiveMQ.
Now,I fount that the following two parameters could cause this problem:
useJmx="true" schedulerSupport="true"
When this configuration is removed,no warn has occurred. So far.
but, Previously I tried to change to false.
Thanks for your help.
--
View
I just verified that example spring-integration no longer throws exception
java.beans.IntrospectionException when creating class
ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory
using URI "vm://0" instead of a TransportConfiguration.
On 13 January 2016 at 16:41, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> that one was a quick one:
>
that one was a quick one:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/321
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Derek Mahar wrote:
> I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-345 to track the
> issue.
>
> Derek
>
> On 13 January 2016 at 14:49, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
>> I see...
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-345 to track the
issue.
Derek
On 13 January 2016 at 14:49, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> I see...
>
>
> The URIFactory will use Bean Utils... and there's a property BeanUtils
> won't know how to deal with.
>
> It's ignorable.. but we should fix
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> amqp doesn't exist as an schema... Artemis doesn't implement the AMQP
> protocol itself.
I meant to say the client doesn't implement it. you have to use the
proper client/library for AMQP client. Again, look at the example.
amqp doesn't exist as an schema... Artemis doesn't implement the AMQP
protocol itself.
Look at the amqp example, where the proper API / library is used.
it is under:
examples/protocols/amqp/queue/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/jms/example
Notice the package name is:
import org.apa
Boy, getting a simple client working is a chore.
Properties p = new Properties();
p.put("java.naming.factory.initial",
"org.apache.activemq.artemis.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory");
p.put("connectionFactory.ConnectionFactory", "amqp://localhost:5672");
p.put("queue.queue/exampleQueue", "exampl
I see...
The URIFactory will use Bean Utils... and there's a property BeanUtils
won't know how to deal with.
It's ignorable.. but we should fix it.
Can you open a JIRA on Artemis?
a Simple new ActiveMQConnectionFactory("vm://0") on a testcase will
report the exception on logs.
On Wed, Jan 13
Example spring-integration reports the warning if I initialize bean
"connectionFactory"
(org.apache.activemq.artemis.jms.client.ActiveMQJMSConnectionFactory)
using URI "vm://0" instead of a TransportConfiguration in
examples/features/standard/spring-integration/src/main/
resources/spring-jms-beans.
There are code examples setting the context properties using
org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory.
But I get a class not found error. I cannot locate an Artemis 1.2 jar
containing this class. Should I be using
org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory instead?
Tha
It's ignorable I think.
If y provide how to replicate it I will make sure the bean Utils will ignore
it.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 12:30 PM, Derek Mahar wrote:
>
> Oh, I hadn't seen that warning about the NIO! I was actually referring to
> the subsequent warning that includ
Oh, I hadn't seen that warning about the NIO! I was actually referring to
the subsequent warning that included a long stack trace:
WARNING: Error when creating PropertyDescriptor for public synchronized
boolean
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.client.impl.ServerLocatorImpl.setThreadPools(java.uti
a.) Regarding your last answer (thanks for your effort by the way):
I'm aware of the relation between the heap and the systemUsage
memoryLimit and we make sure that there are no illogical settings.
The primary requirement is to have a stable system running 'forever'
w/o any memory issues at any ti
Yes, I was confusing the embedded Artemis broker "server" with the message
consumer, which, like the message producer, is actually a client of the
broker. So in the embedded example there are actually two clients (message
producer and consumer) and one server (Artemis broker). MessageSender
corre
I am trying to get Artemis running and having a security not obvious. This
is my first pass at Artemis and I installed it on windows as a service. I
have checked the artemis-roles.properties, artemis-users.properties, and
broker.xml files and all seems ok as per the user credentials to create a
s
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Timothy Bish"
Date: Jan 13, 2016 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: mailing list issues
To: "Tim Bain"
Cc:
On 01/13/2016 08:52 AM, Tim Bain wrote:
So that's a question I'd never considered: who maintains those mail
daemons? Tim Bish, do you know?
Most Apache s
So that's a question I'd never considered: who maintains those mail
daemons? Tim Bish, do you know?
On Jan 12, 2016 9:10 AM, "spruitt" wrote:
> I know this is not the correct place, but I need help subscribing to the
> ActiveMQ user mailing list. I have tried twice, but I never receive a
> conf
Is there a documentation or a way to configure Apache Apollo to answer ws
requests for MQTT Messages?
LUKAS OTT
CSC Deutschland GmbH - Registered Office: Abraham-Lincoln-Park 1, 65189
Wiesbaden, Germany - Board of Directors: Claus Sch?nemann (Chairman), Josef
Ranner - Chairman of the Supervi
Hi Everyone,
Apache ActiveMQ 5.12.2 has been released.
This release contains a number of improvements and bug fixes found since
the 5.12.1 release.
A list of issues fixed in this release is available here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311210&version=12333874
> On 13 Jan 2016, at 03:30, itelleria wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm analysing how ActiveMQ client manages the threads to send and receive
> JMS messages and I have some questions that I would like to ask.
>
> As far as I've understood when I call connectionFactory.createConnection(),
> I get a Connec
Hi,
I'm analysing how ActiveMQ client manages the threads to send and receive
JMS messages and I have some questions that I would like to ask.
As far as I've understood when I call connectionFactory.createConnection(),
I get a Connection object which launches a Transport thread in the
background
22 matches
Mail list logo
