Re: Daily Message Count - HELP

We use the ActiveMQ Statistics Plugin ( http://activemq.apache.org/statisticsplugin.html ) We have a small camel route that runs on a timer, grabs the statistics from the plugin and stores them in Splunk. > On Feb 23, 2016, at 3:33 PM, gmelase

Daily Message Count - HELP

Evening - I am new to ActiveMQ and my current company is using the application for a large set of applications/messages. We are working to determine how to find the Daily or Hourly amount of messages the entire application consumes or if possible what each queue consumes on a daily/hourly basis. I

Re: Integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WildFly 10.0.0

OK, finally I found the following solution: Instead of adding the ActiveMQ resource adapter configuration to standalone.xml, I added it to standalone-full.xml, which seems to support MDBs. However you have the configure the connection factory with a different name, because otherwise it conficts

Re: why MSG size in activemq is much larger than payload

any idea how changing the value to something lower will impact the broker? I expect the size of the msg payload to be between 400bytes to 1kb? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-MSG-size-in-activemq-is-much-larger-than-payload-tp4708070p4708155.html S

Re: Question: Is AMQP recognized as an embedded broker?

On 23 February 2016 at 17:35, Flores, Paul A. wrote: > Attempting to use 'ampq://localhost:5672' as a uri value in connection > factory but seeing the following. > Error setting up connection/session - error: > No Matching Factory Registered for format := amqp > > Is there a workaround? > > Th

Re: Question: Is AMQP recognized as an embedded broker?

On 02/23/2016 12:35 PM, Flores, Paul A. wrote: > Attempting to use 'ampq://localhost:5672' as a uri value in connection > factory but seeing the following. > Error setting up connection/session - error: > No Matching Factory Registered for format := amqp > > Is there a workaround? > > Thanks. >

Re: Integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WildFly 10.0.0

It looks like you have a Wildfly error so you might get better help on their forums. Based on the link you posted with your error it seems to be related to CDI and the bean manager missing. Cannot upload deployment: {"WFLYCTL0080: Failed services" => {"jboss.deployment.subunit.\"TestAppEar.ear\".

Question: Is AMQP recognized as an embedded broker?

Attempting to use 'ampq://localhost:5672' as a uri value in connection factory but seeing the following. Error setting up connection/session - error: No Matching Factory Registered for format := amqp Is there a workaround? Thanks. Paul

Re: No performance improvement using PooledConnectionFactory (AMQ 5.12.1).

Ok, so it looks like points from the earlier replies of both Tim and myself would seem to apply then. You arent creating and closing lots of connections repeatedly over time, which is about the only situation a pool will help improve performance in. The non-pooled factory doesnt give you back the

Re: why MSG size in activemq is much larger than payload

There is a default minimum amount of 1024 bytes and then the rest of the content length and properties are added to that. I believe this is done to account for the encoding of the protocol used and for performance reasons so it's not all that accurate and is more of an estimation. You can overrid

why MSG size in activemq is much larger than payload

I am sending 400byte msg to activemq but when I see the msg size in activemq it shows size of each msg as ~1472 byte msg. Why is the size so much larger than the payload? How to reduce the overhead? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/why-MSG-size-in-activem

Integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WildFly 10.0.0

Hi, I'm trying to integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WildFly 10.0.0 using the ActiveMQ reource adapter and a standalone ActiveMQ server. I configured the reosoure adapter in WildFliy standalone.xml similar as described in the posting https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/HowToUseOutOfProcessActiveMQWithWi

Integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WildFly 10.0.0

Hi, I'm trying to integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WildFly 10.0.0 using the ActiveMQ reource adapter and a standalone ActiveMQ server. I configured the reosoure adapter in WildFliy standalone.xml similar as described in the posting https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/HowToUseOutOfProcessActiveMQWithWi

Integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WebLogic 12c

I'm just trying to integrate ActiveMQ 5.13.1 into WebLogic 12c. When I deploy the resource adapter activemq-rar-5.13.1.rar I get the following errors on the WebLogic console: <23.02.2016 07:04 Uhr MEZ>(AdminObjectsHelperWL.java:62) at weblogic.connector.external.impl.RAInfoImpl.(RAInf

Re: No performance improvement using PooledConnectionFactory (AMQ 5.12.1).

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > I can't say for sure from your summarised description and partial > code, but it seems like you may only ever create 1 connection object > with the factory. If so, explicitly creating multiple connections and > splitting your producers acr

Re: Node.js and ActiveMQ communication

Has anyone used JavaScript Stomp clients with ActiveMQ? Which Client library do ActiveMQ developers recommend? Thanks, Abhi -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Node-js-and-ActiveMQ-communication-tp4707922p4708061.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing lis

Re: No performance improvement using PooledConnectionFactory (AMQ 5.12.1).

On 23 February 2016 at 10:53, Frizz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Timothy Bish wrote: > >> ... and for the case of many senders you might >> indeed see a performance drop since you are now reducing the number of >> connections to what looks like eight, so all those producers are now >

Re: No performance improvement using PooledConnectionFactory (AMQ 5.12.1).

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Timothy Bish wrote: > ... and for the case of many senders you might > indeed see a performance drop since you are now reducing the number of > connections to what looks like eight, so all those producers are now > restricted to eight connection to shovel all thei

Message processed in wrong order

Hi, I encounter an issue with Camel (2.13) and ActiveMQ (5.11.1) on JBoss EAP (6.1) where messages are processed in wrong order. It only occurs if there are a lot of messages send to a single queue. I can reproduce it with a very simple example: 1000