Hi,
I am having trouble sending a custom Object Message to a STOMP consumer with
ActiveMQ v5.11.1
In Jconsole, I can see messages being dequeued by STOMP consumer but the
subscription callback is never called.
However note that if I send a simple string as object message it gets
processed by STO
Thank you for the feedback.
I have created a simple test case for this based on one of the ActiveMQ basic
examples (attached to this mail - App.java).
I create two producers, one that will send messages to virtual topic
VirtualTopic.> and another
one that will send messages to virtual topic V
Is there a specific reason the default configuration won’t work for you?
(Either don’t set anything, or explicitly set the default of
I tried a simple sample using the defaults, and it seems to accomplish what
you’re after.
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Nuno Oliveira
> wrote:
>
> prefix
I think I found the issue it was a typo in the activemq.xml leveldb config.
I setup a new test I'll report back.
Thanks
Mike
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Leveldb-not-recovering-from-failover-tp4709307p4709317.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailin
OK, since this works in one container (WebLogic) and not another (WildFly) -
my suspicion is with the container handling of the exception.
Turning up the logging on org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession to DEBUG on
the JMS client should cause the following to get logged:
* ... Transaction Commit :.
I have a 3 node cluster on Redhat servers running ActiveMQ version 5.13.2 and
Zookeeper 3.4.8
The system runs without error for days then when I fail it over it will
sometimes will not recover see log segment below.
The strange thing is I’m getting a Connection refused even from the master
connect
To answer this question you may read chapter "13.6.1 Bean-Managed Transaction
Demarcation" of the specification "Enterprise JavaBeans 3.1, Final Release,
November 5, 2009".
Message driven beans with bean-managed transaction demarcation are not
called with an active transaction. The MDB may use the
Hi,
Generate the other passwords in credentials-enc.properties like
'activemq.password' and 'guest password' using the new key and then it will
work.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-password-encryption-Error-tp4702761p4709296.html
Sent from the A
I have also tested in 5.13.2 and issue is still exists.
I have a windows 64 bit environment in which i was also not able to
replicate it but it is replicable in other system that we have, both 32 and
64 bit windows.
Number of messages in which it will replicate is not consistent but it will
eventua
I have run this test a few times and it I never get a null message, which
could just be because there is a race condition that isn't happening for
me. Can you test with a later version such as 5.13.2 to see if it still
happens for you?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 7:07 AM, Rohit Sonawat
wrote:
> Yes
I now took thread dumps of activemq while it was taking so long to
start up.
This is where it seemed to spend most of the time:
http://apaste.info/H1c
So it looks like it is reading the kahadb journals. Does anyone have an
idea why it seems to matter if the master restarts (fast) or the dlave
Yes I am using default broker configuration
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-content-returns-null-occasionally-from-Virtual-Topic-to-the-consumer-tp4709151p4709292.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Are you using a default broker configuration for your test (broker.xml)? If
not, can you post your configuration?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Rohit Sonawat
wrote:
> Waiting for a reply and i am going to raise a bug in Active MQ 5.12.2.
> My test results show evidence that there is a promine
13 matches
Mail list logo
