Re: Question about priorityURIs feature

2016-06-18 Thread Arkin Yetis
Thank you. On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:06 AM Tim Bain wrote: > Because "randomize=false", local1 will always be tried first, and local2 > will be tried only if local1 is unavailable. > > I'm not sure what the answer to your second question is, and unfortunately > I don't have the ability right now

Re: Question about priorityURIs feature

2016-06-18 Thread Tim Bain
Because "randomize=false", local1 will always be tried first, and local2 will be tried only if local1 is unavailable. I'm not sure what the answer to your second question is, and unfortunately I don't have the ability right now to read the FailoverTransport source code to find out. Though of cour

Re: jars needed for a jms client application

2016-06-18 Thread Tim Bain
Keep in mind that which library JARs you need depends on which lines of the source code get executed I your specific application. Chris's approach is the safe one, because it includes everything you might possibly need without being as bug as the uber-JAR and it's future-proofed as dependencies ch

Re: Some positive feedback about mkahadb

2016-06-18 Thread Tim Bain
Christian, that's great news, thanks for sharing. Since this feels like a post that people may be referring back to, there are a couple things I think are worth adding. If DLQ'ed messages are the only long-lived ones, I would expect a similar result from using mKahaDB with one KahaDB for normal d