Re: Producer count keeps increasing

Hi Tim, Thanks. After we fixed the problematic client, ActiveMQ is working as expected. The producer count stays stable even client exits abnormally. ActiveMQ is doing the cleanup correctly. -- View this message in context:

Re: Integrating ActiveMQ with a shared user database

Answer to this please. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Integrating-ActiveMQ-with-a-shared-user-database-tp2343451p4714291.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Large amount of PageOverflowIOExceptions per second

I wouldn't expect that to be normal behavior, but I don't use transactions so I can't say for certain. But my starting assumption would be that that means something's wrong in your setup or in the behavior of your producers/consumers. Tim On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Martin Lichtin

Re: Producer count keeps increasing

Glad you found the problem. The answer to your question about the behavior if the TCP connection is broken is that yes, I believe that will cause a cleanup. But keep in mind that hard-killing a process with an open TCP connection doesn't result in the connection closing till the OS times it out,

Re: Problem Consuming from queue with more than one consumer

OK, so you're looking for competing consumers, which queues give you by default. The caveat to that statement is that if you have a large prefetch buffer (e.g. the default value of 1000) and one consumer connects before the other one and there are messages waiting on the queue, up to the prefetch

Re: How do I Set Up Multiple ActiveMQ Services on one Windows Machine

I don't run on Windows, so I can't help with specifics, but in general you'll need to make sure you deconflict the ports used by the two services to let them co-exist. You can set those ports via environment variables (letting you use a single config file) or hard-code the ports in the config

Re: Read-only user functionality

The community as a whole is not focusing exclusively on Artemis. Some people work on Artemis, some people work in 5.x. Many people hope and expect that at some point, Artemis will take over as ActiveMQ 6.x (whether it's called that or not), and the 5.x codebase would then be left behind, but

Re: ActiveMQ CPP 3.9.3 PriorityBackup not working

Without knowing for sure, I'd guess it's a bug that hasn't been fixed (and probably doesn't have a JIRA bug open for it), so I'd suggest you submit a JIRA bug about it. Tim On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Jawad Bokhari < jawad.bokh...@expertflow.com> wrote: > The priroity backup feature isn't

ActiveMQ Realm on database

Are there any another plugins for simpleAuthentication of ActiveMQ? I want to configure my user realm and authentication to be in a database like MySQL. I got this idea thru the concept of jdbcRealm. Essential Part: I'm using tomEE to host my ActiveMQ application and therefore disregarding

Re: Consumer does not reconnect

Tim Bain wrote > Can you please explain what aspects of your answer are expected to solve > the specific problem that Martin is describing in this thread, and why > they're expected to solve it? At first glance, I don't see why using > synchronous TCP closes would influence failover of

DEFAULT_NAME_PREFIX deallocated prematurely

Hi, I’m not sure how to approach fixing this. We have a very large code base which makes it tough to post test here that can be reproduced easily on other systems, otherwise I’d do it. I’m posting this here in case someone else as run across this issue: We’re getting a seg fault when the

How do I Set Up Multiple ActiveMQ Services on one Windows Machine

I am using ActiveMQ-5.13.3 with jdk1.7.0_79 on a Windows 7 laptop for testing. I ran bin\activemq-admin and created two instances: prod and test. I successfully started both instances from the command line and they work great. I would like to create two Window's Services: one for prod and the

Re: Problem Consuming from queue with more than one consumer

Hi Tim Thanks for the response. Perhaps round robin is not the best way to describe it. What I am trying to do is this. I have a producer that sends XML messages to the queue. This happens quite fast. I then have to consume theses messages, process these messages and send the result to a

Ever increasing Kahadb Logs

Hi All, I'm wondering if someone can point me in the right direction, I'm struggling to find how to reduce the size taken by the Kahadb log files. I've been searching online and everything points to messages that are sat on the queue that have not been ack'd by a consumer. I'm using Hawtio to

Re: Consumer does not reconnect

Can you please explain what aspects of your answer are expected to solve the specific problem that Martin is describing in this thread, and why they're expected to solve it? At first glance, I don't see why using synchronous TCP closes would influence failover of connections managed by a

Re: Consumer does not reconnect

Hi, configure your broker URL with this failover:tcp://:,tcp://:?closeAsync=false Hope it helps! Regards, Crishel Yumul DevOps TORO Limited -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Consumer-does-not-reconnect-tp4714039p4714219.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User

Re: problems getting test results deterministic

Hi Yes, this shifts the probabilities somewhat, but still doesn't make it work all the time. In the exact current setup plus ?create=false I got 3 times missed messages and 17 successes. But I still have a Thread.sleep at the beginning of every test and a System.gc which should both not be