clebertsuconic wrote
> Would be too bad to cut a 2.6.4 release tomorrow and a 2.7.0 mid Jan?
2.6.4 release would be good for now.
Thanks,
John
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
ActiveMQ Artemis is not meant to be a complete re-implementation of the
ActiveMQ 5.x code-base with support for all the existing features. Artemis
is a completely new implementation with support for the same protocols
(i.e. OpenWire, AMQP, MQTT, STOMP) and many of the same features (or
I use spring activemq/artemis.I want to schedule message period as in
activemq.
Why Artemis do not have AMQ_SCHEDULED_REPEAT property?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
I use spring activemq/artemis.I want to schedule message period as in
activemq.
Why Artemis do not have AMQ_SCHEDULED_REPEAT property?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
I just send a dev list post with a heads up.
If you guys could answer it there.
I’m planning 2.7.0 soon. We won’t probably be doing many 2.6.x unless
really needed.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:54 AM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> It would be nice to set producing credits per address as well. (Me
It would be nice to set producing credits per address as well. (Me
thinking as an user)
I will need to check about anonymous producers thought.
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 1:24 PM Youyu Shao wrote:
> Thank you very much. This is very helpful. What is the timeframe for 2.7.0?
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
I was busy with the refactoring on AMQP (PR just sent)
Would be too bad to cut a 2.6.4 release tomorrow and a 2.7.0 mid Jan?
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 8:26 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> > I saw in the dev forum a release was planned for week of 3rd Dec -
> doesn't look like this happened though?
>
