FYI - I opened ARTEMIS-4760 [1] for this issue. I'll send a PR with a fix
soon.
Justin
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4760
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 12:46 PM Justin Bertram wrote:
> I believe this is a bug in the MQTT implementation. As noted in the
> documentation [1]:
>
> >
MQTT is fundamentally a pub/sub protocol so it doesn't really match with
JMS queue semantics which are point-to-point. STOMP might be a better
choice for you from Angular.
Is there a specific reason you are mixing JMS queue and MQTT?
Justin
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 12:11 AM Pushparaj
Dear Justin,
I appreciate your attention to this issue. Now, I will explain my
overall scenario. I'm using JMS to produce notifications for my end-users
to remind them of certain actions. This JMS (in spring boot) sends messages
to the ALERTS queue. I need to write a consumer to listen to
Where exactly do you see the re-ordering of messages and how are you
determining that they are, in fact, re-ordered? Are they re-ordered in the
target queue itself or on the consumer(s)? Do you have a way that I can
reproduce this behavior?
If I recall correctly there is just one thread that
Have you conclusively determined that the STOMP acceptor is _causing_ the
difference? If so, do you have a test to reproduce this behavior? Perhaps
this is just a coincidence?
> Is the Messagebuffer to high?
I'm not sure what you mean by "Messagebuffer." Can you clarify?
Justin
On Fri, May
I believe this is a bug in the MQTT implementation. As noted in the
documentation [1]:
> Automatic queue creation is for queues that would not otherwise be
created during normal operation.
However, the MQTT implementation is deciding on whether to create the
subscription queue based on the
Done.
Justin
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 12:28 PM Jerry Zou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I please request an invitation to the ActiveMQ slack channel for
> jerryzoub...@gmail.com?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Best,
> Jerry
>
Hi,
Can I please request an invitation to the ActiveMQ slack channel for
jerryzoub...@gmail.com?
Thanks in advance
Best,
Jerry
Hello Community
in an artemis 2.33 cluster with relatively high rate of core messages we
enabled a stomp acceptor on one broker.
Compared to the other brokers in the cluster that have <1 MiB used Address
Memory the modified guy goes up to 250 MiB.
There is no stomp client attached. The value
Intern
Hello,
I have an Artemis cluster with several nodes.
In many cases, messages arrive on one node and are consumed from another node.
The cluster-connections between the nodes do their work to make that happen.
But under high-load we see messages being re-ordered between the broker-nodes,
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 2:14 PM Balamurugan Ranganathan <
rbalamurugant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have configured Artemis and created an address & topic using the console.
>
> Address --> *UI*
> Queue --> *ALERTS* (ANYCAST,MULTICAST).
>
> In backend (using java 21) I am able to
Dear All,
I have configured Artemis and created an address & topic using the console.
Address --> *UI*
Queue --> *ALERTS* (ANYCAST,MULTICAST).
In backend (using java 21) I am able to access the queue name as
*UI::ALERTS.*
But using ANGULAR (ngx-mqtt ) It shows an error message as *Queue does
Hello Justin,
I believe I have found a part where an additional header is added:
org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.persistence.impl.journal.LargeServerMessageImpl
(Line 108, Tag 2.31.2)
if (!coreMessage.containsProperty(Message.HDR_LARGE_BODY_SIZE)) {
Hello Justin,
thanks a lot for the ticket and your work!
Regards
Bernd
Am 03.05.24 um 06:54 schrieb Justin Bertram:
I opened ARTEMIS-4759 [1] to deal with this and sent a PR. Thanks for the
report!
Justin
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4759
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 9:33
14 matches
Mail list logo
