please unsubscribe me.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Fabian Gonzalez <
fabian.gonza...@mulesoft.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is my first message so greetings for all.
> I am facing a situation where activemq seems not to respect the order for
> dispatched messages when a redilevery is nee
Unsubscribe
On Jul 12, 2016 2:23 PM, "Rich Bowen" wrote:
> As you are no doubt already aware, we will be holding ApacheCon in
> Seville, Spain, the week of November 14th, 2016. The call for papers
> (CFP) for this event is now open, and will remain open until
> September 9th.
>
> The event is div
Unsubscribe
On Jun 24, 2016 10:16 AM, "FrankS" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a project that uses a network of ActiveMQ brokers. We use
> a
> fixed set of network connectors. The test team has been performing outage
> tests by shutting down services, killing services, and rebooting servers
broker in this case)
if the resource is active or not.
Programmatic: is there a way to send a (JMS) query and look for a response
to
ascertain the avalability of the broker?
Oris there a file sytem artifact that the broker creates by which I could
confirm that its
running?
Thanks,
/U
--
View
I have an identical problem with 4.1.2. Is the duplex
keyword implicitly set to true in 4.1.2 network connectors?
Documentation seems to suggest this keyword was
introduced in 5.0...
Thank you,
/Ur
toff wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> thank you again. I confirm that taking avay the duplex attribute do
I have an identical problem with 4.1.2. Is the duplex
keyword implicitly set to true in 4.1.2 network connectors?
Documentation seems to suggest this keyword was
introduced in 5.0...
Thank you,
/Ur
toff wrote:
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> thank you again. I confirm that taking avay the duplex attribute do
corresponding transport connector element. For example this will disable
> the inactivity monitor.
>
> uri="tcp://localhost:61616?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0"/>
>
> Joe
> Goto www.ttmsolutions.com for a free ActiveMQ user guide
>
>
>
> /U wrot
