OK, I stand (well, sit) corrected. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> we've spent a lot time addressing file handles/startup time - ActiveMQ
> scales well in 5.3
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
> On 20 Nov 2009, at 11
It was my experience that ActiveMQ does not handle that well
(destinations are not particularly "lightweight") and you'd do better
to have a smaller number of destinations with selectors. RAM is not
the main/only issue -- file handles and startup time also caused
problems.
Thanks,
Aaron
On W
andle high number of selectors or topics.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Aaron Mulder
wrote:
> Let's say I have 100,000 stock tickers (or whatever) I want to track,
> each with a separate client.
>
> There seem to be two approaches -- putting them all in one t
Let's say I have 100,000 stock tickers (or whatever) I want to track,
each with a separate client.
There seem to be two approaches -- putting them all in one topic and
having each of the clients use a selector (ticker equivalent in a
header property), or putting messages for each header on it's ow
If I have a Java object that I want to use as a message payload, with
the vm:// transport and no persistence, is there a way to avoid having
it serialized? I saw a note in the code that JMS requires
serialization for ObjectMessage and a setting to avoid that, but it
didn't really work. When I tri
I seem to remember a page on the ActiveMQ site that discussed the
specific tables/columns used or needed in a database used as a JDBC
persistent store. But I can't find it now. Can someone point me to
it?
Thanks,
Aaron
I don't see anything obviously wrong with the config files. I
normally give each networkConnector a unique name attribute, but I
don't think that would cause it to not work. I don't typically use
the Web console, though (I think issues like the negative message
count are known) -- to test it "the
Could you post the config files for both servers just for a sanity check?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 4:15 PM, jpoloney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I can telnet into the IP addresses from both machines. So, queue1 can
> telnet into queue2 and queue2 and telnet into queue1.
Are you validating the XML just to make sure it's not a syntax error?
I get stuff onto disk with a configuration like this (and a producer
sending 1 MB messages):
...
...
Thanks,
Aaron
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at
I am by no means an authority on this, but I'm not sure the store
usage or temp usage settings are actually used for anything.
I believe you want your memory usage setting to be high enough to hold
all the traffic you expect to be in memory at once. I think this is
e.g. non-persistent messages th
To be a little more specific, in ActiveMQ > 5.1.0, you can set a
username and password on the Camel ActiveMQComponent that's described
on the page James pointed to. In ActiveMQ <= 5.1.0, you need to
configure the ActiveMQConnectionFactory as one bean and set the
username and password on that one,
I believe I was told there was some kind of multi-step upgrade path
from old 4.x releases to new 4.x releases (if you want to upgrade the
server and multiple clients with minimal down time), but as far as I
know the folks who worked that process out haven't gone to 5.x. I can
try to get more detai
When you say "JMS binding component", do you mean you want to use JMS
from ServiceMix or Camel, or are you just trying to use a regular Java
client to talk to ActiveMQ?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:04 PM, floulou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I want to do my first applica
You can change the file to use the URLs with versions in the name. I
find that my IDE doesn't work with the versionless URLs either (though
it seems that Spring and XBean are OK with it).
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.1.0.xsd
http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring
ection.
Thanks,
Aaron
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Aaron Mulder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've set up a master/slave cluster, and I'm running a test that
>> launches threads for 20 producers and 20 consumers and they read/write
>> persi
I've set up a master/slave cluster, and I'm running a test that
launches threads for 20 producers and 20 consumers and they read/write
persistent messages of 10kB to a queue. The consumers are using sync
receive() calls at the moment. When I start the test, I immediately
get lots of exceptions fr
I did not see this problem with the admittedly inefficient test class
attached (which is only the consumer part).
Thanks,
Aaron
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:17 PM, jydev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Getting the following error with VirtualTopic on 5.1, when there are more
> than
But really, doesn't the build build a build without you needing to use
the release process?!?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Aaron Mulder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Move your eclipse files away for long enough to do the build?
>
> Thanks,
>
Move your eclipse files away for long enough to do the build?
Thanks,
Aaron
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can I build a distribution without having to upload or do any SVN actions,
>
> I'm reading
> http://activemq.apache.org/releas
15, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Aaron Mulder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This may not be as bad as the subject sounds, but...
>>
>> I enabled security by dumping all 3 of the default files from
>> http://activemq.apache.org/security.html in activemq-5.1.
,
Aaron
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Aaron Mulder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So here's what I've observed attempting to send 1 MB messages to a queue:
>
> With the default settings (5 MB limit per queue, 20 MB memoryUsage
> limit), it slows the producer after
So here's what I've observed attempting to send 1 MB messages to a queue:
With the default settings (5 MB limit per queue, 20 MB memoryUsage
limit), it slows the producer after 4 messages.
If I bump the memoryUsage to 200MB, no change (seems limited by the
queue limit).
If I then set the queue lim
This may not be as bad as the subject sounds, but...
I enabled security by dumping all 3 of the default files from
http://activemq.apache.org/security.html in activemq-5.1.0/conf and
then putting this in the broker config:
Answer: "when it's ready." :) Best Guess: There's a vote on a
release candidate underway now. If all goes well, should be a few
days, but if showstopper issues come up, perhaps more on the order of
a week.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:44 AM, activemqnewbie <[EMAIL PROTECTED
t; Andrew
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
> Mulder
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:07 AM
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
>
>
> Subject: Re: Retroactive consumer...yes, no, maybe so
Do you want to post your example that's *not* working? I last used
retroactive consumers probably 18 months ago, and they worked fine at
that time. I was doing a network of brokers with fail-over, and if I
took one broker down and caused a consumer to fail over, it missed
messages during the fail
26 matches
Mail list logo