Re: Question about priorityURIs feature

Thank you. On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 5:06 AM Tim Bain wrote: > Because "randomize=false", local1 will always be tried first, and local2 > will be tried only if local1 is unavailable. > > I'm not sure what the answer to your second question is, and unfortunately > I don't have the ability right now

Priority URI utilization with failover transport

In the following example from http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html failover:(tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616,tcp://remote:61616)?randomize=false&priorityBackup=true&priorityURIs=tcp://local1:61616,tcp://local2:61616 Will local1 always be tried before local2 or is the

Re: ActiveMQ 5.13.3 Linux distro signature verification failed

/18/2016 11:39 PM, Arkin Yetis wrote: > > Hi, > > After downloading the 5.13.3 Linux distribution, the MD5 and ASC > > verifications failed. I tried more than once. > > I used the following page to download: > > http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5133-release.html &

ActiveMQ 5.13.3 Linux distro signature verification failed

Hi, After downloading the 5.13.3 Linux distribution, the MD5 and ASC verifications failed. I tried more than once. I used the following page to download: http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-5133-release.html Could someone confirm that the signature verification has worked for them? Thanks, - Arkin