Re: jms correlation id

2007-11-26 Thread Bas Schulte
On 14-nov-2007, at 11:39, James Strachan wrote: Compliant JMS providers should preserve the JMSCorrelationID you set. Clear as a bell, nice, just what the doctor ordered. Just to be safe, I'll stick with amq ;) Thanks, bas. -- bas a schulte - http:// www.connecte

jms correlation id

2007-11-14 Thread Bas Schulte
Hi all, i'm slightly confused about jms correlation id. Am I free to use it *and* can I expect the jms provider (in this case activemq) to leave it alone or could there be cases where the jms provider sticks something in there? I've read mixed stories, stating that the app can use it but

Fwd: Stumped: using web console to talk to remote broker

2007-10-12 Thread Bas Schulte
Never mind. Seems to be a FAQ but Nabble's search currently doesn't work too well due to problems with people.apache.org (timeouts). After registering with Nabble searching works fine and I found the answer. No go in 4.1.1., unfortunately. Begin forwarded message: From: B

Stumped: using web console to talk to remote broker

2007-10-12 Thread Bas Schulte
Hi, I'm running activemq stand-alone and want to use web console, deployed in jetty or tomcat, to manipulate queues etc.. I can't figure out how I can do that. Web console by default comes with this application context: class="org.apache.activemq.xbean.BrokerFactoryBean">